your organization objected to in your legal briefings. what about this decision do you disagree with? yes, it s true that the court did not adjoin certain parts of the statute. some parts of the statute had no teeth. some parts were not challenged by anybody, but one example of a place where we were seeking an injunction from the court and did not receive it was with respect to these two day laborer provisions that you mentioned earlier related to getting into a car in order to work and the court felt that at this point in the case, she was unable to join them because of some other case law that s moving through the appeals system. but we re confident that our first amendment claims on those grounds will be victorious later in the case. that aspect of the law struck me as one of the most impractical, in terms of figuring out when someone s getting into a van, exactly what purpose that is. this is just a temporary
your organization objected to in your legal briefings. what about this decision do you disagree with? yes, it s true that the court did not adjoin certain parts of the statute. some parts of the statute had no teeth. some parts were not challenged by anybody, but one example of a place where we were seeking an injunction from the court and did not receive it was with respect to these two day laborer provisions that you mentioned earlier related to getting into a car in order to work and the court felt that at this point in the case, she was unable to join them because of some other case law that s moving through the appeals system. but we re confident that our first amendment claims on those grounds will be victorious later in the case. that aspect of the law struck me as one of the most impractical, in terms of figuring out when someone s getting into a van, figuring out what purpose that is. but this is just a temporary injunction. walk us through what the next
same-sex marriage couples going to various courthouses or city halls throughout california and getting married as early as today. the judge could issue a long-term stay and say no marriages while the case goes through the appeals system. there is a third option here, and this is a bit more nuanced here, ali. and that s the judge could say that marriages could take place, but then, then he could do what he did here and issue another temporary stay and allow proposition eight sponsors to appeal while this goes to the ninth circuit. so three different options here. obviously as you mentioned, a lot of anticipation. and again, we re expecting this to come down at any moment. we ll hear from you when they do. one very quick question for you, dan. what happens if, if the judge does lift the stay? can people go and get married today? if the judge lifts the stay, people could conceivably go get married today.