not fall within what s normally an executive privilege area. when you re up to no good and misconduct, that isn t something that s protected by executive privilege. that was established in the nixon era when the court finally said there is such a thing as executive privilege. so i think that s what they re going for, don, and, again, i think it s a delay tactic by the republicans, and this is just going to go on for a long time before we get answers. let me follow up on that because you brought it up. you know a lot about executive privilege. i mean if the appeals court if the appeals court rules against trump tomorrow, does that undermine all of the former president his allies who are claiming that they are covered by executive privilege, john dean? no, it would not. in fact, it would be surprising if the court expanded executive privilege to cover former presidents. there has been a very narrow
going to go on for a long time before we get answers. let me follow up on that because you brought it up. you know a lot about executive privilege. i mean, if the appeals court, if the appeals court rules against trump tomorrow, does that undermine all of the former president and his allies who were claiming they are covered by executive privilege, john dean? no, it would not. it would in fact, it would be surprising if the court expanded executive privilege to cover former presidents. there has been a very very narrow privilege for ex presidents. harry truman once invoked it and said i won t appear in front of congress during the mccarthy era and testify because of executive privilege. nixon got a very narrow exception in a case that went to the supreme court but this is, as i say, being used by trump as if he were still president but as the lower court reminded him,
A lot of things happened. Here are some of the things. The Inevitable Outcome A top administrator for the Carroll Independent School District in Southlake…