but in the eyes of michele s family, it was finally justice. and then then an extraordinary thing happened. my first reaction was, come on. the judge is not going to accept this guy s claim. a new witness with an amazing story and it turned the harris case on its head. coming up as i was going by the harris property, there was a blonde woman out there, looked like she was crying. i know it was her. had someone seen michele? it was the most bizarre story you could have ever told. get ready for trial number two. when dateline continues.
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20190309:10:44:30
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
courthouse, the third kal harris murder trial is ruled a mistrial by the judge. a mistrial. it was the outcome nobody wanted. we got closer to justice, but we re not there yet. michele s family convinced they knew the truth that cal murdered michele, left the courthouse without comment. not right now. and the county prosecutor, kirk martin, vowed to do it again. there have been two guilty verdicts in this case, and i eagerly await the earliest possible trial date that fits with the court schedule. a fourth trial? really? yes, indeed. in march, 2016, deja vu all over again. same courthouse, same cast of characters, with one notable newcomer. good, how are you? judge richard moss. the new judge suddenly had a starring role in trial number four. he would decide the case.
was it true? if kevin tubbs really did see michele in the early morning hours of september 12th, then the prosecutor s case was in ruins because cal harris couldn t have murdered her some seven hours before and an innocent man had just been convicted, so the judge tossed out the verdict. called for another trial and sent cal home to his kids. many including michele s family thought tubbs story was bogus. everybody knew he was lying. you know, it was the most bizarre story that you could have ever told. then of course when trial number two opened in 2009, the prosecution attacked tubbs credibility. why did he wait six years to come forward? he was pure gold. a man to create reasonable doubt. there simply isn t enough evidence to convict cal harris of murder. bill easton was one of cal s attorneys. there s not an eyewitness to it, an earwitness it to, he
also decide whether to hear the defense s new evidence. in the end, he allowed some, but not all. lead defense attorney bruce brquette. the truth has finally began to peek its head at this trial. we begin to see an outline of whether or not is actually responsible for michele harris s demise. a peek or two, that s all. barquette made the most of it, quoting testimony about something the steel worker once said, something about michele. he says i was the last person to be seen with her when she was alive. defense attorneys said they wanted to put stacy stewart on the stand but couldn t track him down. so now in closing, barquette didn t offer a detailed theory about what happened to michele, didn t have to. i m asking the court to find mr. harris not guilty because there s not proof beyond a reasonable doubt he committed
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.