that was held was policed very poorly the vigil was policed very poorly. so that was an opportunity to say, let s look at this. that s probably one of the reasons why the report is so hard hitting. it says some very, very telling truths about the way we deal with issues around county lines and the resources we put into that as opposed to domestic abuse. so, as long as the recommendations of this report followed, we will see change. the danger is we often have reports on the recommendations gather dust on shelves and i don t think we can allow that to happen any more. women have been treated appallingly for far too long. we need a sea in attitude. ., ., , . ., attitude. you have experience of this first hand. attitude. you have experience of this first hand. i m attitude. you have experience of this first hand. i m talking - attitude. you have experience of this first hand. i m talking about| this first hand. i m talking about the idea of information sharing. this point always se
thank you very much for being with us. what went wrong in lambeth? the council was us. what went wrong in lambeth? tue: council was totally us. what went wrong in lambeth? tte: council was totally dysfunctional, totally corrupt from top to bottom and people were not looking to see what was going on. and when you have that level of dysfunctionality and the deep, deep levels of corruption, then all too sadly and appallingly, what comes out, to me, is not a surprise. what comes out, to me, is not a sur-rise. ., what comes out, to me, is not a surprise- surprise. and we have seen this before in other surprise. and we have seen this before in other areas surprise. and we have seen this before in other areas of - surprise. and we have seen this before in other areas of the - before in other areas of the country. what do councils need to do to stop this sort of thing ever happening again? what sort of safeguards do we need to see that we have not had in the past and maybe do not have n
that his approach has already seen trust among victims reach rock bottom. victims have been treated appallingly over the last 18 months. promises made, torn up, gaslighted by the secretary of state at this dispatch box. little wonder that many have greeted today s proposals with deep scepticism and question whether it is more an exercise in shoring up narrow party support than it is in delivering the reconciliation the communities of northern ireland crave. lord dannatt was head of the british army and now a member of the house of lords, he gave us his view on the government s proposals. there is this issue of unresolved decks, there is this issue of unresolved decks, and there is this issue of unresolved decks, and i think the proposal to have decks, and i think the proposal to have a decks, and i think the proposal to have a statute of limitations, not ideal. have a statute of limitations, not ideal. i have a statute of limitations, not ideal, i would like the least worst
general, remains so fragile, precisely because the pain runs so deep. it s why any proposal to deal with legacy must have victims and the communities of northern ireland at its heart. that requires real care from the secretary of state. it is deeply regrettable that his approach has already seen trust among victims reach rock bottom. victims have been treated appallingly over the last 18 months. promises made, torn up. gas lighted by the secretary of state at this dispatch box, little wonder that many have greeted today s proposals with deep scepticism and question whether it is more an exercise in shoring up the narrow party support thanit shoring up the narrow party support than it is delivering the reconciliation communities in northern ireland crave. because we must not forget that this government gave victims their word just 18 months ago, they promised to
right, that is something that has that no one in the nba has articulated. they re still in china. let us get back and maybe they ll be able to see that. no one said, of course the protesters are right. appallingly, no one on espn which is about a third of all sports coverage at least has articulated that because they can t, because disney, not only does deals with china, literally is a business partner with the chinese government at disneyland shanghai. so there s been this oppression of what you ve been able to say about this. step back. this is about nba teams. the nba in china but this is something companies of all stripes face. 1997, hollywood and that was disney and sony got the got this treatment from china and they and that was when they were still early emerging market for them and they backed off apologized because they had a movie out that was pro-dalai lama. this is not new. the concern i have comes back to