him, under his new anti social behaviour, does he think more bullies will be brought to justice? hello, welcome to the programme. all eyes on downing street. the opposition accusing rishi sunak of dither and delay tonight after the pm decided he needed more time to consider bullying allegations into his deputy dominic raab. also tonight changes to the uk s illegal immigration bill. new proposals that would give the home secretary the power to ignore europeanjudges who might try to stop deportations. we will talk ai are we ready for it? nobody seems quite sure what the guardrails could or should look like. can it be done on a piecemeal basis or do we need a global response to the advances that are coming. and saturday is earth day, so tonight we are going to look into an industry you might not associate with the race to net zero. formula one. we will speak to their new director of sustainability, who is targeting zero emmissions by 2030. all that coming up but we start tonig
room, theyjust wanted to stand outside and see him but will probably catch a glimpse of him very shortly. i think this was boris johnson s big moment, as he saw it, to set the record straight. it feels like we have been building up to this moment in the last two weeks. we ve heard from scientists, civil servants, other politicians, political aides. servants, other politicians, politicalaides. it servants, other politicians, political aides. it feels like it was building up to this man, boris johnson, who ultimately made all the big decisions. questions to answer about lockdowns, about how decisions were made, the culture within downing street, i m sure tomorrow we will get to the likes of partygate and some of the things that happened laterally into the pandemic. but i think the striking moment this morning was his apology, it had been trailed in the newspapers over the weekend that he would apologise, seek to set the record straight, he certainly did that, he saw two took pe
around the government s plans to send some asylum seekers to rwanda, which you remember faced a send some asylum seekers to rwanda, which you rememberfaced a number of legal challenges as soon as they were introduced more than a year and a half ago. the government is expected to introduce a bill that ministers say it will aim to block the legal challenges. there is debate within the conservative party about how far that bill should go, what that bill should include. the first thing is, suella braverman saying, it must come in her view, to supply the european convention on human rights. the second thing, suella braverman was sacked by rishi sunak as home secretary and since then she has really been seen as a potential flag then she has really been seen as a potentialflag bearer then she has really been seen as a potential flag bearer for the then she has really been seen as a potentialflag bearerfor the right potential flag bearer for the right of potentialflag bearerfor the r
particular heated moments or weak, this is particular heated moments or weak, this is about particular heated moments or weak, this is about two dozen complaints going this is about two dozen complaints going from three departments spanning multiple years. it is suggesting that there s something going suggesting that there s something going on suggesting that there s something going on here that transcends one incident going on here that transcends one incident and one person saying something off the cuff that they did not mean something off the cuff that they did not mean to them could later get away not mean to them could later get away with not mean to them could later get away with apologising for. that is ultimately up away with apologising for. that is ultimately up to away with apologising for. that is ultimately up to the away with apologising for. that is ultimately up to the prime - away with apologising for. that is i ultimately up to the prime minister
believe he is saying sorry for, i country. i m not clear what you i believe he is saying sorry for, you told us he s been appallingly let down by the people around him and a culture appeared to have existed as though he had nothing to do with that. $5 though he had nothing to do with that. , , though he had nothing to do with that. m ~ , that. as i say, the prime minister s apology that. as i say, the prime minister s apology was that. as i say, the prime minister s apology was there that. as i say, the prime minister s apology was there for - that. as i say, the prime minister s apology was there for all - that. as i say, the prime minister s apology was there for all to - that. as i say, the prime minister| s apology was there for all to see s apology was there for all to see in the house of commons. i am s apology was there for all to see in the house of commons. i am asking ou what in the house of commons. i am asking you what you in the house of commons. i am as