have others, the three major contentious points of this memo, the problems that are there. because i think i m sympathetic to the argument that in some instances you got to use drone strikes when there s no other opportunity, but the definition of imminence is really stretched here. it s almost orwellian. when you get to a high-level official, the memo seems to suggest that you can do this without anyone vetting the decision of a single person, and whether that s the president or anybody else, it doesn t even state. i think that s also a gigantic problem. and the fact that the memo doesn t go into but you have 11 members of the senate, 8 democrats and 3 republicans, who have asked the white house to turn over the legal memos that this sort of sums up, cover these drone strikes, and the white house has so far been