choice. viability, it seems to me, doesn t have anything to do with choice. but if it really is an issue about choice, why is 15 weeks not enough time? a lot of the colloquy you ve had with all of us has been about the benefit of stare decisis, which i don t think anyone disputes. it is true that casey identified brown and west coast hotel as watershed decisions, but is there a distinct set of considerations applicable to what the court might decide as a watershed decision? usually, there has to be a justification, a strong justification in a case like this beyond the fact that you think the case is wrong. and i guess what strikes me when i look at this case is that, you know, not much has changed since roe and casey. that people think it s right or wrong based on the things that