Which the majority of clubs voted in favour for . Called anchoring its more of a spending cap, and could come in the season after next. Heres our Sports Editor dan roan with more from one of the clubs opposing the possible introduction, Manchester United. The Current System known as the profit and sustainability regulations has been very controversial because everton and Nottingham Forest have fallen foul of it and been docked points for breaching a rule that restricts losses over a three year period. Some clubs have been pushing for a new system which would effectively mean a hard salary cap known as anchoring. It would see clubs allowed spending on new players and wages limited to a multiple of the amount of money earned by the lowest placed club in television revenue. Those clubs believe that this would bill mean a fairer Premier League and a more competitive balance at a time when the likes of Manchester City have secured a sixth title in seven seasons. At other clubs such as Manc
Called anchoring its more of a spending cap, and could come in the season after next. Heres our Sports Editor dan roan with more from one of the clubs opposing the possible introduction, Manchester United. The Current System known as the profit and sustainability regulations has been very controversial because everton and Nottingham Forest have fallen foul of it and been docked points for breaching a rule that restricts losses over her three year period and some of some comps have been pushing for a new system which would effectively mean a hard salary cap known as anchoring. It would see clubs allowed spending on new players and wages limited to a multiple of the amount of money earned by the amount of money earned by the lowest placed club in television revenue. Those clubs believe that this would bill mean a fairer Premier League and a more competitive balance at a time when the likes of Manchester City have secured a sixth title in seven seasons. At other clubs such as Manchester
Return with a response, though there is no indication of a timeline. Frank gardner has more, from jerusalem. Whats been being debated is the permission by the Israeli Military for large numbers of palestinian displaced people, currently who are sheltering in the south of the gaza strip, in the south of the gaza strip, in the city of rafah, to move back to their homes in the north. That is something israel has resisted in the past. Israel, reportedly, would also remove some of its forces from gaza. This would be during the a0 day truce. And they would of course be the exchange of hostages and prisoners. Probably hundreds if not thousands of Palestinian Prisoners coming out of israeli jails in return from a rather lower figure that was originally lowerfigure that was originally demanded by israel, an initialfigure of around 33 israeli hostages. Now, from the israeli hostages. Now, from the israeli side, there is a dual pressure going on here. Pressure from the United States to do this de