i think discussions always continue, but the fact that you have these republicans coming out now and saying get this open, and i think you ve seen the effects of this. we ve seen we just had a hearing in judiciary. 70% of our civilian employees in intelligence are now furloughed. the head of the intelligence said, well, we d put them back if we saw an imminent threat. and so then we hear about nih, 72% of their employees. and i was thinking about the fact that they re now deciding to fund certain agencies in the government. it s like a game of whack-a-mole. well, someone got mad about this, so we ll fund that department. oh, there s an antitrust suit that s come up. maybe we ll fund a few antitrust lawyers. this is not how you fund the greatest nation in the world, this is not how you fund the united states of america, this democracy that s been the basis for so many democracies around the world. and so i think they re coming to their senses. i don t think it s going to happen tomorr
i think that scares twitter. harris: wow. i want to get to this paired because there s another big voice in the business world. mark cuban tweeted today, every major tech company google, facebook, is on the phone with their antitrust lawyers asking if they can buy twitter and get it approved. and twitters on the phone with their lawyers asking which can be either white night. good to be interesting. emily. emily: contrast to that, with elon musk tweets before, he said that the next board meeting is going to be lit. to talk about bingo, he s the only one apparently that saw the writing on the wall. i thought it was interesting. the language he used in his letter to the board, where he said, twitter has the potential to serve truly as a free speech marketplace in the global democracy. he says as of now, the way it is is becoming come as an investor, he realizes it will never serve in that capacity in a way to being run right now. it will not serve both as a free speech portal and a