target of the conservatives. if they can overrule this case, roe v. wade. which is a most super precedent case ever, it s the case that three republican justices in 1992, kennedy, o connor and souter said, that s the case that social expectations have crystallized around roe v. wade, so even if you re wrong you can t overrule, it because it would damage the courts legitimacy, they did it here. so, if we can do it, here unfortunately they can do it anywhere, and that is the threat tonight. neil kept, yale social reassures, and all the alerts like. thank you very much for starting us off in this conversation, continue with this conversation, we really appreciate it. and joining us now is kelly robinson, she s the executive director of planned parenthood action, fund and the width of america. what does it mean out there in the country, as soon as it becomes law, which could be june.
differently. the way it is used in the scholarship, and the way that i was using it in the article that you re reading from was to define cases that are so well settled that no political actors and no people seriously push for their overruling. i don t answering a lot of questions about row, which indicates the role doesn t fall in that category. and scholars across the spectrum say that it doesn t mean that roe should be overruled. but, descriptively, it doesn t mean that it is not a case that everyone has accepted and doesn t golfers overruling. here s what s interesting to me, you said that brown is i know my time is running out,, is a super president. that is something the supreme court has not even said but you have said that. so, if you say that, why won t you say that about roe v. wade? a case that the courts controlling opinion and that planned parenthood casey case has described as a super president? that s what i m trying to figure out. well, senator, i can just give yo
could not be left up to the states? yeah, so dalia exactly right, it s the same family and same basic underlying constitutional protections, and conservatives of derided, calling it a penumbra not, the right to privacy not being in the constitution, that s at the supreme court hearings are all around. i d also say it endangers game, marriage it s obviously been a target of the conservatives. if they can overrule this case, roe v. wade. which is a most super precedent case ever, it s the case that three republican justices in 1992, kennedy, o connor and souter said, that s the case that social expectations have crystallized around roe v. wade, so even if you re wrong you can t overrule, it because it would damage the courts legitimacy, they did it here. so, if we can do it, here unfortunately they can do it anywhere, and that is the threat tonight. neil kept, yale social
separately acknowledged that in planned parenthood v. casey, the supreme court s controlling opinion talked about the reliance interests on roe v. wade, which in treated in that case a super president. is roe a super president? how would you define super president. i m out of thought sunday i d be sitting in the chair, but i m not, i m up here, so i m asking you. people you super president differently. the way it is used in the scholarship, and the way that i was using it in the article that you re reading from was to define cases that are so well settled that no political actors and no people seriously push for their overruling. i don t answering a lot of questions about row, which indicates the role doesn t fall in that category. and scholars across the spectrum say that it doesn t mean that roe should be overruled. but, descriptively, it doesn t mean that it is not a case that everyone has accepted and doesn t golfers overruling.
is that it has been reaffirms many times over the past 45 years, as you know. and most prominently, most importantly, reaffirmed in plant parenthood versus casey in 1992. and as you will recall, senator, when that case came up, the supreme court jim just reaffirm it in passing, the court specifically went through all of the factors of stare decisis, in considering whether to overrule it. and then the joint opinion of justice kennedy, justice o connor, and justice souter at great length went through those factors. that was a question presented in the case. social richards,, that is what susan collins confidence was based on. look, we can go over that hearing again, obviously that was devastating. having kavanaugh on the court is. but the truth is we have to look ahead now, and i think what is so distressing, this is now five people in the united