Law and we are delighted today, to have jim zarin here at the law school to celebrate his book. Plaintiff and chiefs. And we will have the format of our team anthony carl who will ask questions of jim. I would like to just introduce jim. He is fundamentally a trial lawyer. His book flames and chiefs, is he trial lawyer news book. Theres an Opening Statement that theres evidence by category and relevance a sneak closing argument. Jim has always been a superb trial lawyer. We met first in 1968, would we both will criminal prosecutors at the Southern District. Jim about my age arrived about 18 months earlier and he by the time, was already a start litigator and prosecutor. In those days, the prosecutor news office in the Southern District was small about 50 lawyers in the Criminal Division. We wash each other and we learn from each other. And jim was my mentor. He took me out of my first trial. Prosecution of young men letters from a mailbox five of them. I think he was a guilty verdict.
Important. And i think you know the statutory requirements with regard for meeting success are very high. So it will take time and measurement to get there and prove that. So we want to get there and hit those measures because thats when we can scale those. We have to be able to show you asked us to show quality and cost. So we have to get there and do that. The other place in terms of the authorities we currently have have to do with the aco work were doing. Pioneer acos and others. We actually just recently, Accountable Care organizations, we just recently put out a version 2. 0 and telamadison was increased in that. With regard to the statutory issues, there are some places and i think we need to have the places about are those places that we can talk about where there might be changes that would free us to do more telehealth, and that is on the medicare payment side. Right. Okay. So lets do two things. First of all, lets work together, and i know senator wicker as the chairman of t
we re al as a mission streetscape plan and better streets plan and everything is that the idea of greening in that sense, actual greens, the city with trees and planted streetscape so when you are talking about the fact the buildings facing parks in effect we are doing medians with trees and greens and bushes and creating mini parks in a way that would fall within these descriptions. and there has to be some coordination in the very plans of the departments putting out in that regard. and the other thing i was pleased to see in there is your comment on the possibility of alternative treatments being available because of all the technology that s been coming through as far as buildings are concerned and perhaps glass technology has evolved more and is evolving faster than anything else in building materials that i have seen. and that will continue to do so and will affect what we re talking about here. so just to put something down as an absolute doesn t all work until there i
we invited craig to come talk to you about that. the bulk of the presentation after they covers that material will be the differences between the draft one and the draft two. i know you have been receiving a number of com hents. we received some as well. i ll spend time going over what we see as the major issues and then turn it to you guys before that. i wanted to give craig a couple of minutes to talk to you about the federal housing piece that you asked about at the last hearing. good afternoon, craig adelman, i don t have much this the way of remarks, i am mainly here to answer questions. i know there were questions before you in the past about about we lease to own housing opportunity which is is not something that san francisco has traditionally done and not been real common in california and in particular, as you may or may not know, the mayor s office of housing and the redevelopment agency serve as having an agencies agencies and one of our primary impacts
you asked about a few detailed questions. you asked questions about affordable housing. we invited craig to come talk to you about that. the bulk of the presentation after they covers that material will be the differences between the draft one and the draft two. i know you have been receiving a number of com hents. we received some as well. i ll spend time going over what we see as the major issues and then turn it to you guys before that. i wanted to give craig a couple of minutes to talk to you about the federal housing piece that you asked about at the last hearing. good afternoon, craig adelman, i don t have much this the way of remarks, i am mainly here to answer questions. i know there were questions before you in the past about about we lease to own housing opportunity which is is not something that san francisco has traditionally done and not been real common in california and in particular, as you may or may not know, the mayor s office of hous