What is it that makes us intolerant of some brutal, dehumanising violent actions yet forbearing when faced with similar actions against others? There are few things more intriguing than the politics of violence.
male holding a knife with a track playing in arabic. you said the purpose was not to encourage anyone to destroy others. he referred to coufal in tom is a metaphor to destroy non believers. you said it is a battle against the soul not to sin. you said thatjihad can be translated to mean striving against the run for the size of the soul against the devil against hypocrites and his believers. the person holding the knife in the video is portrayed as a soldier. you challenge some of the assertions in the statements of the police officers in relation to comments it was claimed he had made on arrest and you made no comment responses to all other questions. the police returned on the 25th of may 2022 to conduct a further search of your address and they found the combat specs ops glasses, camouflage
you were no longer welcome in that you were no longer welcome in that you would be asked to leave if you attended in the future. you were noted by one of those at the mosque to be talking, and on occasion joking aboutjihad and war. it was noted that your whatsapp status was changed to kill the non muslims where ever you see them. members of the various mosques you attended warned you about your behaviour. 0n the 25th of april 2022 you searched the 25th of april 2022 you searched the internet for usman khan and another along with the london bridge attack, links to those involved in terror attacks on london bridge and borough market in 2017 and at fishmongers hall in 2019. in may 2022 on a number of occasions you were seen dressed in an armyjacket or a bomberjacket. you were expressing views about how to deal with non believers. also that month you recorded yourself reciting words in arabic referring to jihad.
would be one of eight years custody with a range of sentence between six and ten years custody. the prosecution has identified a number of aggravating factors. they submit that here the offending was motivated by hostility towards non believers. you were in possession of extremist material. you were in contact with others who were also extremists, particularly miss a. used a number of aliases to conceal your true identity. you intended to commit acts of terrorism against soldiers and/ or police officers. you failed to respond to warnings about your conduct, particularly from your family and others in the mosques. whilst some of those factors are accepted, he makes observations as to the applicability of others. as a general point i agree that i need to make sure that to the extent of these matters go into the initial categorisation i do not double count. in terms of mitigating
with faith-based production continually performing well. crowdfunding may be one reason why the film did better than expected when someone invest in the project, they may be more likely to attend and telling their friends and family about it. do you agree with that assessment? that s something that worked with angel s studio, they found me and the film. they re the ones that s bringing out across the country and the world, that s something that they had the idea for is when you bring in the crowds, the crowds, once you invest in it, you are invested and not only you but your family. you are going to tell your family and friends and everybody about it that you are going to support it all the way through. what s the big message in your assessment from this movie? so, this is one of the most controversial accounts in scripture. it is something that non-believers would scoff