and liquor, 49 is seasonal. i forget if it is just beer and wine, forget the number. 41 is just beer and wine. yeah, 41 just beer and wine. these would be different types of full liquor license would be prohibited but you can obtain someone else s in the district or citywide. only in the district. so if another restaurant went out of business and sold it they could transfer that to another in the district. the idea is to keep the same number of them that are already there. okay. i guess my question is that i always thought when you wanted to get a liquor license that you had in terms of abc you had to obtain one in existence but they do issue new ones now? they may. i m not entirely sure but you can pull them from different parts of the city as well, so this would limit it. so the key difference here is the restriction is that you have to obtain one from a restaurant that is in the district as opposed to getting the liquor license from somewhere else in the
seeing none, commissioner antonini. i have a few questions for aaron probably. okay. so the report says that the limited restaurant is one that is not permited to have on-site alcohol consumption. correct. which includes beer and wine. correct. so that would require a cu by this legislation. correct. in case of the other restaurants that is a 47 or 49, which i think is probably some are beer and wine and the other is all kinds of alcohol, if i m not mistaken. 47 is for beer and wine and liquor, 49 is seasonal. i forget if it is just beer and wine, forget the number. 41 is just beer and wine. yeah, 41 just beer and wine. these would be different types of full liquor license would be prohibited but you can obtain someone else s in the district or citywide. only in the district. so if another restaurant went out of business and sold it they could transfer that to another in the district. the idea is to keep the same number of them that are already there.
yeah, 41 just beer and wine. these would be different types of full liquor license would be prohibited but you can obtain someone else s in the district or citywide. only in the district. so if another restaurant went out of business and sold it they could transfer that to another in the district. the idea is to keep the same number of them that are already there. okay. i guess my question is that i always thought when you wanted to get a liquor license that you had in terms of abc you had to obtain one in existence but they do issue new ones now? they may. i m not entirely sure but you can pull them from different parts of the city as well, so this would limit it. so the key difference here is the restriction is that you have to obtain one from a restaurant that is in the district as opposed to getting the liquor license from somewhere else in the city. i think in almost all cases you have to acquire one that is already in existence unless i m not familiar wi
or land use jurisdiction from the department over this lot. that is what i wanted in the public record. i m in support, as you are, move for approval. second. commissioner antonini. ms. wadi, just questions. i noticed some of the accompanying material approved assumed the project sponsor will clean it up and do landscaping and also be responsible for making sure that there s not trespassing and overnight habitation and things on the lot because, unfortunately, when there is that kind of activity, if the owner does not request police department remove people who are illegally occupying the space, you know, if you come by and tell the police that they won t do that unless the property owner himself or herself does it. i think that is part and parcel of this, you know, approval that they have to maintain and police the area properly. so currently there are conditions of approval dealing with security of the facility or requirements relating to the police department. th