even on the hardest left i come across. here s the deal, chris, he only has one play in his play book and it s this deception-deflection thing. think about what we just went through on health care in the debate about the affordable care act and whether to repeal it or fix and repair it is. all he had was talking points. he never put anything of substance on the table. he thought it was all about spin. it was all about appealing to people and sometimes frankly there were basic instincts. and by anlage in this circumstance, he is not dealing with the substance of what s going on here. it s a single play and bob muller doesn t care what he says at a rally in west virginia. he cares about the law and he s going to get to the truth
guess what mr. president, bob mueller does not intimidate. do you think the white house should be concerned about this grand jury? of course. i worry about the government having the kind of power. notice what he is doing. he s changing the targets. he was supposedly going to look into russian collusion. the articles this morning say it looks like it s going to be hard to prove. maybe because it didn t happen. the president said it s a witch hunt. it s fake. last night i believe he called it a fabrication and we know that the nature of these types of investigations become fishing expeditions where you re showing gel up against the wall and hoping something will stick. the problem with that anlage is they throw the gel against the wall because some of the gel
so the fact that the president wanted to hold these conversations one-on-one strongly suggests that he didn t want anybody else around that would give verifying element of the conversation. the president is disputing what happened and it would probably help him to have a partisan there to say no the president s version is correct because right now we re down to mr. comey s version of events versus president trumps. what does your legal mind see in all of these angles yesterday? i don t think the president of the united states gets to have a learning curve. his cabinet should ensure it s not necessary number one. number two it would have been appropriate to make between the loretta lynch context and the one happening here with the russian collusion it s the president, the former president had been the one to say change the investigation into matter then we could have a relevant anlage. you think of what s happening
in his first term fired the fbi director william sessions for a different reason. he was accused of improperly using government money to visit relatives and build a fence around his house that didn t provide any security. et cetera. this is unusual even given that preceding event. it s more than unusual it s never happened before in american history that an fbi director has been dismissed by a president who is being investigated by that fbi director. the only near precedent is october 20th 1973 when president nixon fired archibald cox that was the watergate special prosecutor and i think the anlage is a very close one. the fact that a some what
and, you know, getting up there and going to his go tos which is seeing ivanka trump and jared and pointing to them and getting in the campaign mode that i care about american jews that isn t what he was talking about. the sense is does he have a handle on behavior on problem that is really disconcerting. so let s take the anlage from david that you have what he says and what he does. at this point you have to fairly assume he s going to say whatever he wants to say. but what he does, so now we re seeing his administration of the white house, you have the labor secretary stepping down and some nominees by his own party. we re seeing thing where is his actions to david s point are not meeting expectations.