so joining us is fox business network adam shapiro. adam, what more do we know? reporter: we have statements from mastercard and visa saying their potential security systems were never compromised. it happened at a third party processor. let s get into it. statement from mastercard. we quote, continue to both monitor the event and take steps to safeguard account information. visa in their statement takes it a little bit further. they say visa is aware of potential data compromise incident at a third party entity affecting card account information from all major card brands. there has been no breach of either civil. talk about major card brands. we re talking about banks. we have called the major banks in the united states. jpmorgan chase refuses to comment on this you have statements from citibank which says they are taking every step necessary to protect customers information. quote, they make it a top priority. we take appropriate steps to inform and protect clients when
caylee s law that would make it a felony for parents not to report the death or disappearance of a child within a certain period of time. 24 hours or less in most cases. joining us now to talk about it, anita kay, a criminal defense attorney, phillip ray is a former prosecutor. phillip, what would be the idea behind this law, and would it have in some way saved caylee? well, yes, i think that this is a good law. i think what they re trying to do is determine what happened in this circumstance so they can try and prevent what happened to this child. and i don t believe that given a law that says if you don t report, that the child would have been saved, i don t think that s true. i think the law could have come into effect after she started telling all of her lies, and certainly in that moment when she took the detectives to orlando and was walking through the universal studios trying to tell her this is where i used to work and they discovered that lie, they could have charged her wi
jury has already spoken in fact, i think it was juror number three was they felt sick to death to find this woman not guilty. and i think that tells you everything you need to know about how they felt about the case. whether or not the evidence was inconclusive was the jury s inability to make a decision based on what was and wasn t placed into evidence. jon: anita kay, phillip ray, thank you both. thank you. thank you, jon. patti ann: a fox news alert, we have new details on that deadly airplane crash. a plane carrying more than 100 passengers, and rick folbaum is at the breaking news desk with more. reporter: it s a frantic rescue operation that we believe continues to be underway right now after that plane crash in the central african nation of the democratic republic of congo. forty people, we re told, were pulled from are the wreckage of the boeing 727, that s according to local government officials. the plane crashed as it was,
to create which would be she did not report the child s disappearance for 31 days. jon: if a parent doesn t care about his or her child or a caregiver for that matter, if they don t care about the child, what good is it going to do to have a law that says you ve got to report it if well, i think the law is going to be designed to punish those people who don t. jon: go ahead, anita. the difference is everyone is outraged about the verdict, and they re looking at she was convicted of four misdemeanors for lying to police. if caylee s law were in effect, she would be charged with felonies, not just these misdemeanors. so there is repercussions, there is punishment. will it necessarily be a deterrent? not necessarily. but then the punishment is there on the other end for parents who don t. and it might prompt other family members who know things about a missing child to inform police and law enforcement. so it may work that way. and this is the type of thing that should come from thi
you know everybody s upset, the jury has spoken. but positives can come from this such as new legislation. jon: what about then in she received, phillip? the judge gave her four years. a lot of people were surprised that he gave her that much given the outcome of this trial. i think that s an unrealistic expectation to be surprised the judge gave her a maximum verdict. you re looking at the possibility of a woman who, as said, lied to law enforcement. how do you judge what the punishment should be? how severe was the lie? the lie to law enforcement created a huge amount of search for this child, and every little lie she told created more work for these people to try and find the child, and they were never able to do so under the information she was begin. so i can t imagine a circumstance where you would have a lie to law enforcement that had greater consequences than couldn t find a missing and, at this time, dead child. a maximum verdict is absolutely accessible. jon: anita, a lot