the couple s third dog, bandit, was initially believed to be unharmed, but the humane society discovered he suffered injuries, too, but not from the killer. we discovered that bandit actually had several puncture marks, which indicated that he had been in a fight and probably had been in a fight with the other two dogs. so the dogs attacked one another, but not the killer, even while the killer was beating them. and they stood there and they took their beatings, and then they went and they hid. to animal behavioralists, the reason was clear. and a stranger wouldn t have been able to beat those dogs brutally the way they were beaten without them fighting back. somebody obviously knew the dogs, so it had to be somebody that, you know, they weren t going to fight back. it seemed pretty clear from the evidence that only one person could have done this crime. but prosecutors had a problem. the surviving dog, bandit, obviously couldn t tell police what happened. so investigat
had been in a fight and probably had been in a fight with the other two dogs. so the dogs attacked one another, but not the killer, even while the killer was beating them. and they stood there and they took their beatings, and then they went and they hid. to animal behavioralists, the reason was clear. and a stranger wouldn t have been able to beat those dogs brutally the way they were beaten without them fighting back. somebody obviously knew the dogs, so it had to be somebody that, you know, they weren t going to fight back. it seemed pretty clear from the evidence that only one person could have done this crime. but prosecutors had a problem. the surviving dog, bandit, obviously couldn t tell police what happened. so investigators had to dig deeper and started by looking into jeff lamb s finances. a few years earlier, jeff s former employer accused him of