And by the way, youll get a pretty good b. S. Monitor as you watch this more and more, who really means what they say. The key is does the person who is running for office saying what theyre going to do, if they get elected, do they actually do it . Thats really what matters. Is it just fluff . Is it just bluster, or are they actually pushing the cause, fighting for the idea . And the last point i would say is get beyond emotion. Dont base your decisions on emotions or make your arguments based on emotion. Go deeper than that. Go to reason. Rita quinas here at georgetown, base your decisions based on reason, logic, principle, and find out if a person actually has that. If theyre taking their decisions and filtering through a set of principles that offer solutions so that theyre going in a consistent direction, so theyre not pandering or being simply a populist or simply running in circles. That, to me, is what i found is helpful when youre trying to judge whether or not a person has ea
We are having this discussion because low wage workers in the Fast Food Restaurant have paved been fired to raise the wages of themselves than their coworkers. That is the only way to get out of the drop that justins analysis hypothesizes. I think to ask a question about Public Policy measures, be they minimumwage kerrmcgee rtc labor and unemployment, you have to ask the question, are they are promoting a high wage lowwage society . We dont like the lowwage society but weve consciously built one and we can make different choices if we wanted different. Michael, did you want to come in . I will be brief. To think about it from the broad 30,000foot level of society to recognize the different agents in society have been responsibilities. Imagine workers firms in the government. In some sense, damon is arguing that we dont miss the lowwage system. If you talk about fast food industries, restaurants and lowwage workers, it is simply unrealistic to expect that a firm that is substantively tr
Attention to that and done a better job. And if we havent made real discernible progress in that the next several years thenly be disappointed in myself and in the bureau . Very short answer to this one, is there a political future for Richard Cordray . Which would consider running for an Elective Office in ohio . Its not a political job. I understand its a job done in a political con teblings but its a federal context, but its a federal job and thats how i see it. You can send more questions morningmoney if you have something in mind get it ready in the next few minutes. One good question that came in how does this cfpb choose the market and which authority . How do you pick in the nonbank area what you focus on and which tools you use . I think your question there just illustrated there are a lot of choices to be made in terms of how to prioritize our resources and our work. How do you pick in the nonbank area what you focus on and which tools you use . I think your question there ju
Repeatedly tried to blame Insurance Companies too. Heres what the Washington Post fact checker had to say about that. The administrations effort to pin the blame on the Insurance Companies is a classic case of misdirection. Thats the Washington Post. Classic case of misdirection. They got three pinocchios for that whopper. Unfortunately that doesnt seem to have deterred our friends on the other side from indulging in the blame game. Within just the past week weve seen the white house lash out at the words of a cancer survivor and try to point a finger of blame at texans. And a few days ago get this one one of the president s closest political allies attacked the very kind of folks who are now losing their Health Coverage under obamacare. Free riders he called them. Free riders. You know the folks hes talking about. These arent people who have done anything wrong. Theyre not freeloaders or free riders or anything else. Theyre our neighbors, our constituents, and theyre not looking for h
Were looking at some other questions that have been raised ability what else we should do and looking at those issues. Again, working in cone cert with other agencies as well as states and local communities. So while hydrofracking has raised concern about whether it can be done or is being done safe and responsibly. Ep is working with states, local government, and the industry to make sure that we understand how to answer those issues effective from a science perspective, and in a way that continues to maintain the availability of inexpensive natural gas that strengths the economy as well as help us reduce air emission. I appreciate that. I think it seems like a reasonable response. Someone who asked you environmental law far long time. Please, do what you can to work with the administration. So we dont have overlapping of potentially inconsistent regulations. Very frustrating for the public. We want it to be done responsibly and in a way people can understand. Thank you for being here