it. rethe one hundred and fifty person, the one hundreddr and fifty or nine person supreme g court get rid of it. it s no longer useful. have a r they can t have a republicanepub as flip as they did from warren to david souter easily anymore . so they re like adolescents.s a they re angry.re ang fifty state union, we very 5unin 60 years bring ing two more states to get senators. same thingsenator same. a national voting law toti override the constitutional prerogativeon of each state to set, you know, balloting laws. and then we have the two hundred thirty two year old electoral college once a blue wall fell like little kids, they got angry and said get rida of it. it. the common denominator so the common denominator is all of this is they look at the law as what s useful for the moment, for a progressive agendapr. and when that is no longer true, then they try to destroyti the institutiontu and that s wht they re doing. and it s incumbent on everybody to call eve them out for what the