Judges and courts enforce anti-discrimination and retaliation laws, but are they ever accused of violating those laws themselves? That is exactly what was alleged in a recent Tenth.
Today
Scattered thunderstorms in the morning becoming more widespread in the afternoon. High 58F. Winds NNE at 10 to 20 mph. Chance of rain 90%..
Tonight
A steady rain in the evening. Showers continuing late. Low 46F. Winds N at 10 to 15 mph. Chance of rain 80%. Updated: May 30, 2021 @ 2:48 am
Today
Mixed clouds and sun this morning. Scattered thunderstorms developing this afternoon. A few storms may be severe. High 74F. Winds E at 10 to 20 mph. Chance of rain 40%..
Tonight
Scattered thunderstorms during the evening. Cloudy skies after midnight. A few storms may be severe. Low 51F. Winds N at 10 to 15 mph. Chance of rain 50%. Updated: May 29, 2021 @ 11:11 am
A federal lawsuit alleging discriminatory hiring practices at the Colorado Supreme Court is poised to shed light on the recent allegation that former Chief Justice Nathan Ben Coats and other court employees gave a contract worth up to $2.75 million to a former judicial employee to keep her from divulging the personal misconduct of 20 or more district court judges and administrators.
The Colorado Judicial Department has sent a memo to employees denying the allegation as reported in The Denver Post that the contract was intended to stop Mindy Masias, the former chief of staff of the Supreme Court administrator’s office, from filing a sexual discrimination lawsuit that would expose misconduct of others at the department.
A federal lawsuit alleging discriminatory hiring practices at the Colorado Supreme Court is poised to shed light on the recent allegation that former Chief Justice Nathan Ben Coats and other court employees gave a contract worth up to $2.75 million to a former judicial employee to keep her from divulging the personal misconduct of 20 or more district court judges and administrators.
The Colorado Judicial Department has sent a memo to employees denying the allegation as reported in The Denver Post that the contract was intended to stop Mindy Masias, the former chief of staff of the Supreme Court administrator’s office, from filing a sexual discrimination lawsuit that would expose misconduct of others at the department.