it is under construction as we speak, six levels of occupancy. every room along the facades as a bedroom. how are all these units and these veterans different in proximity to our lot that is here? i believe these projects are very similar and compatible. think you very much. thank you very much. i m an owner of 49 julian. i spoke last time and i want to the project being contemplated is the right project for the neighborhood. it has been proven to be necessary and compatible to the neighborhood used. if you look at the bloc, the current number of households is 194. with that project, it will be bumped up to 202. the last time we were here, there was sentiment similar to what we heard this morning, that the project would prevent the activities of our neighbors. this is not the case. we have made it clear and we will continue to do so today that neighborhood will continue their operations. they have our support, and the new neighbors that will live there will know who their
our cities need for housing subsidies have not diminished. in fact, it only ever grows. worse, it looks like it will be expected to absorb many of the people, projects, and commitments resulting from the demise of redevelopment. [tone] my question to you is does it seem like a good bargain for the city to reject the benefits offered by the project in order to preserve a surface parking lot? president miguel: is there any additional general public comment? if not, the general public comment is closed. commissioners, you re now going to hear the public on the agenda items. if the agenda item has been reviewed and a public hearing has been closed, the opportunity to do so would be at this time. each member of the project may address the commission up to three minutes in this category. the only item on the calendar this would pertain to would be item number nine, case for a 49 julienne ave. we do not have speaker cards for this yes, i do. [reading names] good afternoon,