conversation is. i can t say at this time. whether it s me towards him or him towards me, i think he s made the decision in the end. my stance would be if it is required, regardless of the cost. i can t speak for why that is not reflected, i can t speak for andrew bolts. it i can t speak for andrew bolts. it says the investigator is happy with the report as it stands. that says the investigator is happy with the report as it stands. the report as it stands. that could well be based the report as it stands. that could well be based on the report as it stands. that could well be based on whatever- the report as it stands. that could well be based on whatever he - the report as it stands. that could well be based on whatever he has| well be based on whatever he has explained to me. well be based on whatever he has explained to me. andrew bolts has liven explained to me. andrew bolts has given evidence explained to me. andrew bolts has given evidence to explained to me. andrew bo
what actually occurred at this branch and at the retrieval of the data is free to the post office. but he estimates it will take approximately two and a half days for him to look at it and analyse what it means and this would be chargeable to the post office at £2500 approximately. i ve told him that at present we do not wish to pursue this option unless it became unavoidable. can you let me know your thoughts before i get him to sign it off? this is an e mail to you from andrew bolts, just the two of you involved in this. why if you are not responsible for making decisions about the cost of retrieval, is he asking you whether to pursue it? l retrieval, is he asking you whether to pursue it? to pursue it? i don t really know but in the to pursue it? i don t really know but in the case to pursue it? i don t really know but in the case of to pursue it? i don t really know but in the case of this to pursue it? i don t really know but in the case of this e-mail, l to pursue it?
from the interview in which he is trying to suggest it s an initial loss of £3000 and is attributable to lost data because of installation problems. are you able to comment on the scenario? ultimately we need to discredit this as an explanation that holds any water. he denies stealing the subsequent losses and may be blaming the system for those losses as well. do you think it was appropriate for andrew bolts to e mail mrjenkins to say that ultimately we would need to discredit the defendants? that say that ultimately we would need to discredit the defendants? discredit the defendants? that is andrew bolts s discredit the defendants? that is andrew bolts s way discredit the defendants? that is andrew bolts s way of discredit the defendants? that is andrew bolts s way of speaking i discredit the defendants? that is| andrew bolts s way of speaking to discredit the defendants? that is - andrew bolts s way of speaking to mr jenkins at that time. i only got sight of all this when hi
should be applied for. should be applied for. if we stroll u - , we should be applied for. if we stroll up. we then should be applied for. if we stroll up. we then see should be applied for. if we stroll up, we then see a should be applied for. if we stroll up, we then see a response. - should be applied for. if we stroll. up, we then see a response. andrew bolts says, thank you for considering the position so promptly. i can no confirm the case has been put back. i would appreciate if you can hold back your general comments at this stage regarding the comms problems and send it to me as before and i will send it to me as before and i will send it to the post office to go on to decide whether we request the retrieval of data for your further analysis. i say so on the assumption that the data is available for seven years, an idea of what today s analysis would cost would assist in that decision. why would the cost assist in the decision as to whether to seek the data or not? h
scheme of things, it isn t and if it is required they have to go ahead with it. s ., , is required they have to go ahead with it. s . , ., is required they have to go ahead with it. s ., ., ,, is required they have to go ahead with it. s ., ., , ., with it. was that your answer to andrew bolts, with it. was that your answer to andrew bolts, if with it. was that your answer to andrew bolts, if it with it. was that your answer to andrew bolts, if it is with it. was that your answer to andrew bolts, if it is required, ij andrew bolts, if it is required, i don t care about the cost? basically, that s my stance on it. it s as if he s trying to put it on me to say it s too expensive, but my stance is if it is required for any inquiry or prosecution, you have to get it. inquiry or prosecution, you have to let it. , , ., . inquiry or prosecution, you have to letit. . get it. and it is your evidence you clearly communicated get it. and it is your evidence you clearly communicated t