Disregard house rules. For what purposes . Just completelyusrules on not i wanted to confirm point addressing the Minority Hearing today. If i hear t that one more time, of order is the rules of ill address that when were decorum. I dont believe the gentleman marking up impeachment articles. What is the use of a minority from florida meant to violate him andnt i want to give him to hearing day if youre going have benefit of o doubt. To hear evidence of the markup than once he referred if you get the confirmation of to a new york lawyer. If hek is prepared to explain what he meant, i will withdraw the master bedroomrkup yourself. My Point Of Order. Even the most heated development does not know show any way that that is not a recognizable Point Of Order. Mr. Chairman, Point Of Order can be theyre. If you destroy the institutional regarding the schedule. There is no Point Of Order integrity, which again, the staff have talked about today, regarding the schedule. Well, onf this case there
you can t prove anyvi of it doe and mr. page sat at this not mean you can use all of it. table where you sit and i said that is no way the prosecute a to him, it looks like this case and that is no way to process resulted in them not proceed with impeachment. thank you. the gentleman yields back. finding anything wrong with youw legally. that s how it s w supposed to . mr. chairman? work. what does it mean here when the doj says some things could have been done better, policy, but mr. chairman? ms. carson powell. nobody had bias or broke the law thank you, mr. chairman. i want to come back and in how they conducted the probe? highlight what i think is the well, very clear. they went through everybody s biggest national security threat, andna that s foreign emails and texts and so forth interference into our elections. and i can tell you that in and despite what the president has said about it, there was no florida, we re extremely bias. there was no retreason. concerned abo