They just need tax relief and this is taking a tax burden off their backs but the stimulating nature is well designed so for example, i was at a Manufacturing Company not long ago and my constituents in suburban chicago. The company said this. Peter, were going to invest 30 million in our plant next year if that Tax Bill Plans with full expensing as we proposed, were not going to spend 30 million. Were going to spend 50 million its that type of approach that were trying to create here which is why there was so much enthusiasm about it among republicans in the house. You havent seen this in a long long time. Maria well you have enthusiasm sure but not so much from those 13 republicans who voted no against the house bill. God bless them and if youre chasing everybody all the time in terms of a Roll Call Vote youll be waiting a long time. To get 227 House Republicans to agree on something as big as this is i think incredibly
significant and a good milestone but we still have good work to
that doesn t contribute to growth. maria: that s $650 billion. they could take that money and give relief to everybody across-the-board but particularly in the upper income levels that actually create jobs , create growth. you could see some concessions to ron johnson on the small business side but let s remember too, the nfib, which represents small businesses, is for this tax plan, so when ron johnson says he wants carve outs it s not just for the small businesses. you have companies like cargill also passthroughs 150,000 employees and $2 billion in net earnings. maria: and that s pass through. mary: that s a pass through so there are things that can be done so i think you can pick off guys like ron johnson, susan collins might be more difficult but you know we ll see. they have to get this done. they re going to pay next year. maria: they don t have a lot of wiggle room. ed: you have to get it down to two or three as opposed to seven. maria: let me switch gears look at