they re trying to do their job, be clear concise and truthful in their assessments. when they nominate information to they pick a target to be nominated, to go kill it or degrade it it is being deleted from the targeting package. so some have come out and blown the whistle. and now they feel they cannot even get a candid assessment. he know what s going to happen. so what happens? does this get reversed? who is it that is manipulating the analysts conclusions? according to my sources, it is currently going on with two star generals. then also the civilian senior guy, greg likeman keeps coming up. you have people literally working all the time. it gets to the senior level and gets manipulated. that s where it is right now.
let me be clear. these are good analysts. they re trying to do their job, be clear concise and truthful in their assessments. when they nominate information to t be nominated, to go kill it or e degrade it, it is being deleted from the targeting package. and we re not attacking the hard targets we should be going after. this is all a travesty. so some have come out and blown the whistle. thast that s how seriously they re taking it. and now they feel they cannot even get a candid assessment. he know what s going to happen. so what happens? does this get reversed? who is it that is manipulating the analysts conclusions? well, this actually started under major general scott bairier. according to my sources. it s currently going on with two star generals. also the civilian senior guy, greg reichman name keeps copping up. you have people literally working all the time, trying to pick out the information. it gets to the senior level and gets manipulated.it