Now, that doesnt mean that there isnt an issue where certain students views and certain groups have felt that they have received less active attention from the faculty and the administration. And i include conservative students in that group. They have received less public attention. And i think we need to meet those students where they are, and to help them to develop a place in our public conversation where they feel more included. And sound at 4 00 p. M. Eastern on real america, the 1987 film drug abuse, meeting the challenge. Anyone that says cocaines not addictive, they lie. When you do cocaine, you lie to yourself about being in control. Cocaines not hip. Its hype. Anyone who tells you its okay is a liar. Watch American History tv every weekend on cspan 3. This weekend the cspan cities tour takes you to new port, rhode island. With the help of communications center, well explore newports rich working library, and author peter keernan on shrinking the middle class. Its been the ce
Vehicle. That rule cannot survive foundational Fourth Amendment principles. Searches of the home in curtilage without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable as this court has often recognized. The rule we ask this court to adopt is that the automobile exception does not apply to a vehicle found in the curtilage of the home. Suppose the police have probable cause to believe that the vehicle is stolen, and they even get a warrant to inspect the vehicle, but the vehicle is parked in this port. Do they need a warrant to go get the car for which they have a warrant . Well, your honor, the warrant would specify the place to be searched for the car. And so commonly a warrant would say, for instance, the dwelling and curtilage to look for this motorcycle. So the warrant that authorizes the search of the motorcycle would, by its terms, authorize the intrusion into the curtilage. What if it didnt . So they have a warrant, here, lets say, to search for they have probable cause to search this th
Mr. Chief justice may i please the court. A probable cause is a practical standard and not accounts for the practical limitations officers face when making arrests decisions including the inability to look directly into the minds of suspects offering innocent explanations for suspicious conduct, and so i don a case like this one, but its established in circumstantial evidence of mens rea but a strong or at least fair arrest is reasonable and constitutional, and more clearly qualified immunity applies. Lets turn to the totality of the circumstance from the perspective before you do that, given the other charges in the case relating to Disorderly Conduct and negligent supervision, where do they stand and are they in any way effective in the argument . We do not pursue an argument existed for Disorderly Conduct and supervision. That claim fails if there was neither probable cause were qualified immunity. Thats where they stand, your honor. If i may turn back to the totality of circumstanc
Arrests decisions including the inability to look directly into the minds of suspects offering innocent explanations for suspicious conduct, and so i don a case like this one, but its established in circumstantial evidence of mens rea but a strong or at least fair arrest is reasonable and constitutional, and more clearly qualified immunity applies. Lets turn to the totality of the circumstance from the perspective before you do that, given the other charges in the case relating to Disorderly Conduct and negligent supervision, where do they stand and are they in any way effective in the argument . We do not pursue an argument existed for Disorderly Conduct and supervision. That claim fails if there was neither probable cause were qualified immunity. Thats where they stand, your honor. If i may turn back to the totality of circumstances, my clients responded to neighbors complained im not sure i understand what you just said. Whether we hold the qualified Community Grounds or probable ca
They say collins trespassed the property and went beyond the limits. This oral argument lasts about an hour. Well hear case 161027 in the case of collins versus virginia. Mr. Fitzgerald . Thank you. May it please the court, it cannot be overthrown by the automobile exception. Under the commonwealths argument on propable cause alone, an officer maicer. A vehicle anywhere that he finds it and may go anywhere that he needs to in order to access that vehicle. That rule cannot survive foundational Fourth Amendment principles. Searches of the home in curtilage without a warrant are presumptively unreasonable as this court would often recognize. So the rule we ask this court to adopt is that the automobile exception does not apply to a vehicle found in the curtilage of the home. Suppose the police have probable cause to believe that the vehicle is stolen and they even get a warrant to inspect the vehicle, but the vehicle is parked in this port. Do they need do they need a warrant to go get th