Latest Breaking News On - Amusement sales - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Of the cases that Defense Counsel had cited within their brief that had absolutely no application to the issue that were here before, your honor, today. The first mciver be state has nothing to do. Has nothing related to the disqualification of anyone. I think some of these are just relating to kind of aspiring for broad language about standards to prosecutors. So point taken there but if theyre more all right. Keep it on so as it relates to one of the cases that was referenced here earlier. And as i was also referenced in some of the briefing by Defense Counsel, is the were just savy state, which is to 87 georgia, 542. And ill all of the cases that fall under this, what i would call category is about a attorney who formerly prosecuted a defendant in i guess the same type of case are the same case or similar charges. And that would be why of course, were using the courts found that disqualification would be necessary because of the Relations Kinship that existed between a former client

Conflict of interestThe pointDidn t concern disqualificatio nDefense counselState of georgiaRelations kinshipDistrict attorneyDistrict attorney willisContingency feeDidn t payMotion to quashDoesn tI don tIt sThere isn tWasn t suppressed