buffer from criticism. they acted like they wereial me removed from the process and that social media companieso wncould make their own decisions on how to best moderate content . media platforms makede independent choices aboupendent their information. they present course. it s us upo thesp to these comps to make their own decision about the content on their platform. eir platfoand to ensure contents their own standards and policies. twitter, as you know, is a private company and theyd will make their own decisionthe yeah, right. plausibleah,e deniability is thn name of the game. just send fauci on an endless press tour claiming the science is settled and opposing viewpoints aren t just wrong,ut but very dangerous that way. joe biden gets to keep his hands clean. it seems like the people who spread the disinformation, a very energetic and seemedve gt to have nothing else to do but o do that. so we ve got to be out there,bla scientists and the general public and thosend wh
that s how science is supposed to evolve. but starting s with covid, they censored these doctors. and you have to ask how manyw people how many people around te the world unnecessarily suffered, even died because they censored doctors who are questioning the vaccine efficacy or they are censoring doctors who are advocating for for for covid therapeutics. and they are questioning these covid lockdown s. this is egregiouegregious,s whas happened here and house republicans need to get to thets bottom is the only reason we re learning about this from twitter is because elon muskionn made this. forty four billion dollar investment to buy twitter. think about facebook. tha that s, you know, ten times bigger than twitter. r or google.er than that s twenty five times bigger than twitter. think aboue amout the amount ofa censorship that s happening there. t my qe. yeah, doctor , i think we got you back . now, my question to you was expl to us, your first persont,u account, your personal ex wh