$25 billion for a border wall in exchange for protection but the president walked away for that deal. at the urging of the amnesty crowd, there s a reason they would oppose this new plan. not only does this fail to address daca and wiping out the status of a million immigrants. the other problem is that they really appropriate funds. they did that under president reagan where they can really roll back to the funds so need to have those funds for the border wall. that s when the president ran in on. i think there is a deal to be made if you want to include, i think conservatives may push back a little bit but they understand that we want the wall and i think that something the president can go back to you and still promote but here s the deal, they have their solutions to this matter and they don t want any solutions to this matter.
they say they are serving in our military, like a 600,000 are serving in the military. these are the verbal tricks that the amnesty crowd always uses to put the interest of foreigners who are here illegally ahead of american citizens. it s supposed to be americans first. if not foreigners first, not illegal immigrants first, but americans first. there is nothing nativist or racist or ethnically bigoted about putting our american sovereignty first. the most passionate people who say this are people who are beneficiaries of illegal and orderly systems that put a premium on immigrants that were coming to this country like my parents who put a commitment to assimilation. that is the deal that has gotten thrown under the bus. why is it we have so many politicians on both sides of the
they say they are serving in our military, like a 600,000 are serving in the military. these are the verbal tricks that the amnesty crowd always uses to put the interest of foreigners who are here illegally ahead of american citizens. it s supposed to be americans first. if not foreigners first, not illegal immigrants first, but americans first. there is nothing nativist or racist or ethnically bigoted about putting our american sovereignty first. the most passionate people who say this are people who are beneficiaries of illegal and orderly systems that put a premium on immigrants that were coming to this country like my parents who put a commitment to assimilation. that is the deal that has gotten thrown under the bus. why is it we have so many politicians on both sides of the
they say they are serving in our military, like a 600,000 are serving in the military. these are the verbal tricks that the amnesty crowd always uses to put the interest of foreigners who are here illegally ahead of american citizens. it s supposed to be americans first. if not foreigners first, not illegal immigrants first, but americans first. there is nothing nativist or racist or ethnically bigoted about putting our american sovereignty first. the most passionate people who say this are people who are beneficiaries of illegal and orderly systems that put a premium on immigrants that were coming to this country like my parents who put a commitment to assimilation. that is the deal that has gotten thrown under the bus. why is it we have so many politicians on both sides of the
backed off, and meanwhile, he s sending out mailers saying he s fighting amnesty, he was really being hammered from both sides, there s been a lot of negative attention on him from the pro amnesty crowd. there s something in the republican base that this issue just winds them up in a way that very few do. i ve seen it up close and personal as a reporter reporting on this issue through the years. he gets something very visceral in a certain part of the republican base. this idea of invasion, this idea of being overrun, this idea that people are going to come and pull out the rug from under you, where you live. sure, chuck todd spoke to that tonight that you see it much more prevalent in the south, largely it s because we re the states that are most largely impacted by it, so you see a more visceral reaction, a