allowing criminals into any community is an amistake. i have been on the record. in texas we came out against sanctuary cities. carley: this confirmation hearing is tomorrow. one to watch. congressman van taylor thank you for watching us, we appreciate it? good to be with you. carley: good to be with you and everybody this morning. fox & friends starts right now. the crisis at the southern border continues to get worse. the biden administration has completely abandoned all the people who live on the border and the state of texas. taking on covid vaccine mandates as many americans are being forced to make tough decisions. this is my final stand off. i m being asked to leave. hammering president biden. i think he has done a lot. you are talking all through the years. yes. in china military officials tested nuclear capable
disagreed with a sect of the protest, they were exclus ed it was absolute amistake. it was like a test for the kind of woman that could come. no, i think in part, part of the problem and i only found this out yesterday because she was on our show. and we asked her about this because she s very close with the people who organized. they never the people who organized this never specifically said this is just this is for you. this is for you. that, you know, buns you get too many people involved, everybody says well you can t come and you can t come. from what i understand, and it wasn t the case in new york, because everybody marched in new york. but what i what i was told by her is that that was not true of the organizers, and yes it was a mistake. because this was about women marching. exactly. what else do you think about the march? as a trump voter. what else? i thought some of the rhetoric turned hateful quickly. when you have an icon such as
messaging but they have no competence in terms of governing. that s the first part of it the second part is any time an issue arises they are more concerned about what they are going to say than what they are going to do. to them it s an opportunity to message as opposed to an opportunity to solve it. and here s the third problem. any time the criticism arises from republicans, their first reaction is not to look at it and say let s see there is some credibility here. their first reaction is to label it and treat it as some sort of a partisan attack. for example, i have been in the senate now three and a half years. a significant amount of my constituent case work, are complaints about the v.a. we have been hearing that and reporting that as of other offices for a while. and the initial reaction is always that s just partisan republicans trying to embarrass us. those three things i think really explain why these things keep happening. do you believe that the president is incapable of
messaging but they have no competence in terms of governing. that s the first part of it the second part is any time an issue arises they are more concerned about what they are going to say than what they are going to do. to them it s an opportunity to message as opposed to an opportunity to solve it. and here s the third problem. any time the criticism arises from republicans, their first reaction is not to look at it and say let s see there is some credibility here. their first reaction is to label it and treat it as some sort of a partisan attack. for example, i have been in the senate now three and a half years. a significant amount of my constituent case work, are complaints about the v.a. we have been hearing that and reporting that as of other offices for a while. and the initial reaction is always that s just partisan republicans trying to embarrass us. those three things i think really explain why these things keep happening. do you believe that the president is incapable of
immigration reform until they have answered some real fundamental questions about some issues they have not been very responsible with, like the irs, like benghazi, like obamacare, like nsa. let s see a little bit of competence on something before we even begin to talk about giving them something as big and wide as immigration reform. governor there was word out that a group of g.o.p. a group from the g.o.p. was floating the idea of allow something amnesty for some illegal children. is this amistake? it s a different thing if you re talking about amnesty for children. you have to define it. if you re asking whether or not kids of illegal parents are able to access, let s say, college scholarship, i think that is not an amnesty issue. that s a bigger question. do you punish children for something their parents did? and most americans would say, no, anymore you would give a