saying, in a statement, it believes fervently that it acted lawfully, that it was in good faith negotiations to resolve all matters with bezos. ami promising to launch an internal investigation into bezos long list of claims against him. including when he called extortion and blackmail, when ama threatened to leak risque photos of him. federal prosecutors are also looking into his accusations. in his blog post, ami had a cozy relationship not just with the trump white house, but with saudi arabia. also alleged in published reports. last year, ami put out a 97 page glossy magazine heralding the kingdom s crown prince. the saudi government claimed they had no involvement or knowledge of the ami publication. a man the cia has conclude d
nation national enquirer, as w been reporting for a long time, he has a very close relationship with donald trump and a lot of information has been coming out in the past couple of months in revealing that donald trump could approve stories or not approve stories that are weighing in on him. so this might have been another story that ami has been trying to attack and coh during the election, any story that went through the national enquirer or any ami publication, if that s what michael cohen handled, are there other recordings with michael cohen or somebody else is discussing these kinds of payments that were made or that they were trying to make to
maybe. she says american media incorporated, the parent company of the national inquire paid her $150,000. mcdougal says she thought he was signing a deal that would buy her silence and publish a few health and fitness health column for a.m.i. publication. let me ask you about these consequen coincidences. daniels and mcdougal are both in instances of affairs with donald trump and both of those deals with silence, it seems to be an awfully strange coincidence that they both landed in your lap. don t you think? no, not at all. i have an active practice. there are a few attorneys that would go against large
an ami publication is vetted twice internally before they go ahead with the story. you d have to imagine if they paid the guy $30,000 or whatever money was paid to anybody bringing the story to them, there must be some validity, once they pass through that process. the new yorker quotes a source saying the national enquirer who worked there, we didn t pay thousands for nonstories let alone ten of thousands. this was $30,000, would they have paid that for a story they really did think was completely untrue? you can only draw conclusions by what happened and didn t happen. right, you re saying they would go through a process and they would use that to make a decision, it s worth buying or not worth buying it? sure, yeah. they would have had to have thought there was validity to it? at that point, sure. i appreciate your time. form formerly of communications for american media. is the point man for the russia investigation on ice? new details of a white house effort