results and why tax reform becomes as critical as it: it is the only thing they can look at in 2017 and 2018 as a major legislative accomplishment. it would motivate the party and they have so much riding on it. i don t think any numbers of bills passed unless you have a bill on the president s desk. dana: what about this report that left-wing groups, not necessarily the democratic national committee, but left-wing groups are raking in the cash. a huge amount of fund-raising dumping lots of money into races they do not know how to spend all the money. do you expect that to continue? i think there is no doubt the left has been politically motivated by the ascension of donald trump. the money will pour in.ns it s the mirror image problem that they have that the republicans dealt with with roy more.. they have they ll have the establishment versus grassroots
not that it goes down as a waste of 8 to 10 million dollars but his caucus will be freaked out by the powers out there and talk of more primary challenges and the wild card of president trump as he conducts himself on taxes and as he conducts himselflke politically. dana: there is always competition between the house and senate for who can get more done and who can get things done correctly and paul ryan theus speaker of the house was on hannity earlier tonight. take a listen to what he said. we passed 337 bills in the house as of this week. sean: and you have a different administration? this is more than obama, bush, clinton and h.w. bush. more bills have passed the house this year under donald trump at this time than obama and both bushes and clinton. the challenge we have is this chart. 274 of them are still in the senate. dana: all right. so i get it. that s a lot of activity but is it a lot of activity that doesn t lead anywhere? he is not wrong but i don t think tha
this is a dangerous game the play. when you lower that standard, you have to keep in mind this will not be our last president. and you cast into the wind a very important standard that the framers came up with that has served us well. we can remove a president. maybe this president will commig impeachable offenses but criticizing kneeling during national anthems is not one of them. dana: what does it say to his voters, obviously the losingvo side is bitter for a while. usually they get over it. this hasn t quite happened yet in 2017. maybe we ll get there. what would it say to his voters if they were to try impeachment for something that wasn t an impeachable offense? what happens is it creates an insatiable appetite for people to toss out presidents when they disagree with them and you have a system in england like a vote of no confidence. impeachment is not a vote of no confidence. it s not there if you have next day regrets to get rid of a president.
you know, geico can help you save money on your homeowners insurance too? great! geico can help insure our mountain chalet! how long have we been sawing this log? um, one hundred and fourteen years. man i thought my arm would be a lot more jacked by now. i m not even sure this is real wood. there s no butter in this churn. do my tris look okay? take a closer look at geico. great savings. and a whole lot more. dana: earlier this month president trump announced his administration is fazing out the daca program that protected illegal immigrants brought to america as children from deportation. the president has said he isn t against the program in principle and urged congress to codify it through legislation. three republican senators have introduced a bill and requirement for the dreamers. two join us from washington senator langford and senator tillis.
i will stand here in the well of the congress and i will call for the impeachment of the president of the united states of america. dana: joining us now for reaction from washington is george washington law professor jonathan turley. it s so nice to have you here tonight. in a way i feel this is spinning out of control and somebody like you can explain to us what does the constitution actually say about impeachment? it doesn t say that, that sti for sure. i have a column on this in the hill tomorrow because it s a very dangerous concept that the congressman is advancing. we have a constitution that requires high crimes andnd misdemeanors because the framers wanted to make sure that we don t have impulse by impeachments. and what the congressman is suggesting is that engaging in free speech as president and saying you don t think thisgi should be allowed itself can be an impeachable offense. that would destroy any notion of