administration that he does not trust. right? so he s quick to believe the king. he also is quick to believe putin when he says, oh, he didn t meddle in the election. he doesn t believe there are human rights atrocities for kim jong-un. he said there s love letters and on and on and on. how much does this say about the trump doctrine, that he cozies up to these autocrats and dictators so much, what does that say about him? i don t understand why that would be a tactic that he would want to kind of embrace. i do understand the issue of having america s access internationally being unimpeded, but you do that through very strong alliances, you do that through partnerships. you don t do it by embracing those that clearly don t embrace our values. you can still have a relationship with bad guys. united states can have relationships with bad guys in certain areas. right. but you can t internationally embrace that type of behavior. okay. can t do that. so my question is, because y
would be a tactic that he would want to kind of embrace. i do understand the issue of having america s access internationally being unimpeded, but you do that through very strong alliances, you do that through partnerships. you don t do it by embracing those that clearly don t embrace our values. you can still have a relationship with bad guys. united states can have relationships with bad guys in certain areas. right. but you can t internationally embrace that type of behavior. okay. can t do that. so my question is, because you said it will be handled. i m confident that this is such situation has to be handled. you re not so confident. i m not that confident. handled properly. hopefully the people around him will take care of that. but the question is his rhetoric. could his rhetoric be stronger or different or should it be stronger or different? should he say, you know, there s going to be hell to pay, which i think someone did say. he needs to stand up for americ