ex-president it is explosive reporting from the washington post. there s this saying when it comes to donald trump and his slogan, remember the one on the hats, make america great again, that what maga said make attorneys get attorneys. the late breaking news from the washington post proves this case that now donald trump s attorneys appear to be in special counsel jack smith s cross hairs including some of the most notorious ones. federal prosecutors investigating efforts to overturn the 2020 election have asked witnesses extension sieve questions about the actions of rudy giuliani, including where he got his information about alleged fraud, what he did in the days around january 6th and what he knew about the actions coming that day. people who have appeared in front of the grand jury say. investigators looking into classified documents pertaining to mar-a-lago have sought testimony from another trump lawyer, ben cork ran saying there is evidence that the former president u
denying antics up today because his work is part of a larger picture. part of a brazen and comprehensive assault on democracy on individual freedoms and specially on womens reproductive rights. alarming new reporting lifts the veil on clieb klein s work with a law firm called the thomas moore society. an anti-abortion group that got deeply involved in the twice impeached ex president s big lie campaign. from that reporting, quote, leaping into the 2020 stop the steal frenzy which was consistently discredited, the thomas moore society aggressively pursued complaints across the country. the 2020 election law initiative showed it helped fuel skepticism over joe biden s victory and the fairness of elections in numerous states. these persistent legal challenges mirror the fight over abortion.
but i think american people, particularly women, are fed up and are not going to put up with it any more. minnie, we did some research and if i have this wrong please correct me, but the fda has not never withdrawn approval for a medication that wasn t because of a medical season. now i got nothing against viagra or the men who take it or the women who are enthusiastic about the men taking viagra. but what if viagra, were targeted. not for medical reasons, because this is not an abortion drug being targeted to lose its fda approval for any medical reasons. nothing has been submitted on the medical front. it is for political purpose. what do you think would happen if, again, not for a medical reason, viagra were at risk of being taken off the market, unapproved? viagra is such a popular profitable drug with no quote/unquote controversy behind it. that if it was viagra, you would see pharma and see the big companies weighing in
folks about what matters and why because of this decision. in part, because i think they re waiting for an actual decision to be made. which is too late. let me just for our viewers, let me make perfectly clear what could be about to happen. this is from the times reporting. a decision in favor of removing approval for the drug regiment would be ub precedented. most likely the first time a court would order the fda to revoke a drug against the agency s will. the fda would immediately appeal such a ruling but yet if allowed to stand it would have significant ramifications in states where abortion is legal. not just in those trying to restrict it. this decision could definitely have an impact on what i can provide and in some ways could it be digger than dobbs. that is the senior vice president for program services at maine family planning, referring to the u.s. supreme court case that overturned roe v. wade last year.
you ll see democrats often criticizing republicans, of course, and saying what they re doing is too extreme. but to your point, there is not this sort of consistent urgency ahead of a decision or ahead of something that significant that will effect people across the country. democrats and others, as you were just alluding to, are a little bit too reactive in stead of being protective. and i remember talking with minnie and others before the roe decision about how there was a believability gap between the folks who knew that it was a possibility roe could be overturned but didn t believe it could actually happen. that has closed i would argue completely now and we re seeing how far the courts are willing to go to further restrict access to abortion and reproductive rights. and democrats, i think, are planning to do this through 2024. last week vice president harris said that it was an attack on the foundation of our public health system. but they re not out there sort of rallying and