children. fearful of seeking government aid in a moment of life and death in houston. but i think the president was up to something. i think the timing was significant. i think he did this for the reason you articulated. the fifth circuit court of appeals has found it unconstitutional, basically saying you want these people who are americanized to stay here. i want something in return. that s what he s going to try to get. bret: we will see where it goes. thank you. president trump says the disaster from hurricane irma could ve been much worse. the president was in southwest florida today to get a firsthand look at damage from the second major hurricane to hit this country in two weeks. mike tobin was there and has the story. president trump lending a hand during a visit to the hard-hit naples the state park today. don t forget a sandwich. promising the full support of the administration. we are there for you 100%. i ll be back here numerous time
when his parents took him to the united states illegally. it is little thing that is make me miss back home. last august he was charged with drunk driving and evading arrest, while in jail he lost his status which gave him a chance to live and work in the u.s. after seven months he was deported. maybe i can start my own business. he says he s trying to stay positive. things happen for a reason, i just have to be strong and keep my head up and keep going. unlike many americanized in the country, he has family to turn to. valesco is among them, he s helping his cousin to learn about spanish and more about mexican cultures. he finds the experience is
people. it s not a good idea to try. you need to focus on threats to public safety. and the daca kids are for the most part, as a class remarkably responsible group of people who have come forward. they re on the books now. they re paying taxes. they ve been here in all respects except perhaps legally they are americanized. they ve been here. they grew up here. can they be protected, though? is there anything the outgoing administration can do? that s a very good question. and in the forms we put out, we said this information will not be used by information enforcement. and then there is this boilerplate language that says this policy does not create an enforceable right or whatever it says and can be changed at any time. and so the legal question is whether that boilerplate overrides any representations in the document or whether when somebody applies and they rely on the representations made to them about the limited uses of that, that is an enforceable promise by the u.s. govern
it s not a good idea to try. you need to focus on threats to public safety. and the daca kids are for the most part, as a class remarkably responsible group of people who have come forward. they re on the books now. they re paying taxes. they ve been here in all respects except perhaps legally they are americanized. they ve been here. they grew up here. can they be protected, though? is there anything the outgoing administration can do? that s a very good question. and in the forms we put out, we said this information will not be used by information enforcement. and then there is this boilerplate language that says this policy does not create an enforceable right or whatever it says and can be changed at any time. and so the legal question is whether that boilerplate overrides any representations in the document or whether when somebody applies and they rely on the representations made to them about the limited uses of
and the daca kids are for the most part, as a class remarkably responsible group of people who have come forward. they re on the books now. they re paying taxes. they ve been here in all respects except perhaps legally they are americanized. they ve been here. they grew up here. can they be protected, though? is there anything the outgoing administration can do? that s a very good question. and in the forms we put out, we said this information will not be used by information enforcement. and then there is this boilerplate language that says this policy does not create an enforceable right or whatever it says and can be changed at any time. and so the legal question is whether that boilerplate overrides any representations in the document or whether when somebody applies and they rely on the representations made to them about the limited uses of that, that is an enforceable promise by the u.s. government.