Transcripts for CNN CNN This Morning 20240604 11:40:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
i had worked with him a lot when i was at sunday morning futures and had a relationship with his team. that afternoon, justin came in and he said, here s the plan. tucker s going to first have kevin on, hear him beg and grovel, then we ll bring in matt gaetz, and matt gaetz will then kind of set his terms, then tucker will set his terms that mccarthy has to agree to tucker carlson had terms? yeah, had terms. and we ll make this whole thing happen on air and save the republican party. fortunately for mccarthy s sake, he said no . speaks to the level of influence. that s why this is in a way so shocking. look at that level of political influence that tucker carlson had. he was a power in a part of the party that s the tail wagging the dog right now. and so to suddenly be cut is really amazing, but that shows also this simymbiosis that coul happen with the fox prime-time
The West and its brand of modernity may be waning in favor of an ascendant China, but is it offering anything besides replacing market forces with brute force.
and resettle migrants that cross our southern border. and coordinate it across the country. don t leave it to governor abbott or ron desantis to decide where they should go. one of the criticisms we heard from lori lightfoot, who was on the show the other day, there was no coordination, there were still issues of whether or not they were absolving too much of it. you ran dhs. you were in that same position right now, and may 12th came around next week with the lifting of title 42, what would you be doing differently than what is happening right now? well, i m not in the job. but if you were. it s a much bigger problem than when i was in the job. i would be constantly sending the message over and over again that there s a right way and a wrong way to come here. the wrong way is to cross our southern border illegally. if you come here, we will send you back. address the safe, lawful ways to come here, so that you give people an avenue to come here safely, in a controlled way, but c
was with what was happening at the border. so has that changed here? is it actually going to help in a significant way, or do you think sending these u.s. forces to the border will still be limited, at best, in how it can help? it will be limited, because the limits on what they can actually do. because they re not doing law enforcement or anything like that? they re not engaging directly with law enforcement. they re not engaging directly in interdicting migrants and sending them back. they are there in support. it does help in certain limited ways, but the larger solution to the larger problem is addressing the problem at the source in central america, in haiti, in venezuela, in nicaragua, and creatinge ing lawful safe pathw for people who are desperate to leave their circumstances. what about the images that this creates. because senator bob menendez, he s a democrat and ally of this administration, he said they re militarizing the border by sending these u.s. forces there