mind you, unfortunately they kept coming up on the stand again and again. you got see them on different days, you have to hear them change their stories and do different things, but the fact of the matter is, they raise their hand, swore to you, i will tell the truth, whole truth and nothing but the truth. and they lie. so now as their own daughter stands trial for her life you are supposed to rely on that. you are supposed to believe in that. these are only the lies of her own covers. what about all the other things that could have been investigated and never were. how is it they didn t get his cellphone activity during that time? how is it that they can t tell us the coming and goings of that?
witnesses. one of them may have to impeach at the end of the trial and remember caylee was found with no socks or shoes let s back up i forgot when i was talking w about the pool. that is consistent with someone that is at home. she was at home when she died. she didn t have any socks or shoes on, they didn t recover any shoes. you remember welch after two questions, did you find any socks, did you find any shoes? she was wearing shorts that the fit are anymore. hadn t been worn in over six months.
heather: i found it interesting that it was the prosecutor that on that in the middle of all of this? the prosecutor objected to the defense attorneys comment pointing him out as the guy who is laughing over here, but the prosecutor was laughing. behavior in the courtroom is very important. judge perry runs a tight ship. ashton should know. that both of the lawyers went out of control and there is no love lost. as phil keating pointed out a little while ago. judge perry has a right to be angry. he is about to hold them in contempt. the summary contempt proceeding that happens right in front of him but he has to do it now. he can t say i m going it at the end of trial. that would be a different type of contempt proceeding. i hope he is not going hold the lawyers in contempt. that is major thing. what i ve done i ve taken lawyers into chambers and i ripped them to shreds and that
myriad of questions equals equal doubt. you may not like my client because she is a liar but that doesn t mean she a murderer and accused the chief prosecution witness of being a liar over and over and over and over again. and he called the forensics in this case nothing but a fantasy. and now fox legal analyst. how did he go? better in argument than he did during portions of the proceedings during the trial. he did a nice job of hitting the point that reasonable doubt lives and breatheses. to say to the jury, look, disregard the logical conclusion and presentation of the circumstantial evidence, pull them away from that, and talk about fantasy forensic and the fact that the body and the crime scene have potentially been manipulated and if it was not the existing crime scene how can you trust the forensics and nail
what does premeditation mean? also, you will are given an instruction on dealing with the offense of felony murder by the first degree and that is, again, that caylee anthony is dead and the death occurred as a consequence of and while casey marie anthony was engaged in the commission of aggravated child abuse. not sure what day of the actual trial, butonly thing i am clear is sunday afternoon. where, what, how, why, and when is the evidence of aggravated child abuse? all the witnesses that took the stand didn t know anything about