Elsewhere, both the Socialists and Liberals are equally keen to appease Far-Right sympathisers in other, arguably less ‘contentious’ ways: for instance, by supporting calls – again, coming mainly from farmers – to reintroduce hunting licences, for protected predators such as wolves and bears
“Bidenomics” will rumble on, with huge federal subsidies handed out to companies, all with very little meaningful oversight, and paid for with vast increases in debt. Or alternatively, we might get “Trumponomics Mach II”, except this time around it will be led not by tax cuts and deregulation but by a terrifying 10pc tariff on all imports.
The Washington Monthly Newsletter: November 16, 2023 washingtonmonthly.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from washingtonmonthly.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
so if you want to defend this guy, you have to say things that are silly. it s one thing to say things that are silly on television. that happens. it s quite another thing to say things that are silly in court, in front of a judge and in front of a jury. so i know people worry that there are going to be no consequences for his conduct and for his rhetoric. i believe there will be. not yet, not here, but in court. chuck, sam, you can respond after katty, if you will. we d hear people like rudy giuliani and others saying the most outrageous things after january 6th and actually even before, when they were trying to overthrow the american presidential election. we were like, how do they get away with that? where are they getting away with that? they did. it appears, let s keep our eyes
would you be charging it the same way? well, we don t know what the same way is, and this particular charge on section 241 is compelling and a powerful jury argument, because you can look the jurors in the face and say what this defendant was to try and deprive you of your right to vote in american presidential election. that is a very compelling jury argument. nick, i want to pick up on something that my colleague katelyn polantz talked about is that there because lot of detail in the indictment in mar-a-lago, and do you expect a similar indictment? yes, i do. there is no requirement like there is in a civil case to particularize fraud, and to get into specifics, but here, it is extremely important that the