lesson. sean: it s in the book. all of this is in the book. let me give you a history lesson. sean: tell the audience, this is a hard interview for me. but this is honestly, the amount of work i have been in your house when you do your books. they are stacked up and there is an entire two rooms full of books and papers. i don t know how you do it. keep going. i want people to know how much history is in this. i m a nerd. what can i say. sean: we need a lot of nerds. you mentioned thomaspape. think about what he said, mark, and the history you are going through. government in the best state is but a necessary evil. in the worst state, intel rabblintolerable one. go ahead. the media says donald trump is the greatest threat to freedom of the press we have ever seen, some of them do. that is a flat-out lie. they are historical illiterate. john adams, one of the
barack obama. the f.b.i., department of justice went after the new york times. james rosen of this network. went after 20 reporters of the associated press. barack obama. donald trump hasn t done any of these things. to call him the greatest threat to the press is an absolute outrage. sean: this is just a primer. this is all in this book. history is phenomenal. they even bring up presidential elections charges of bigamy and dueling. you show this history and it s fascinating to see how it has evolved. but i want to bring it to current day. i do believe the president s branding of fake news will forever be tattooed on their foreheads because of how low they have sunk. the book is phenomenal. unfreedom of the press. we continue with the great one, mark levin. when we come back we ll discuss the media unhinged
dictator. if you listen to msnbc and scarborough, i don t know how many times they care him to a nazi or hitler or the words come up describing the president of the united states. you really have to be really unhinged. speaking of that, remember that period that they were bringing a professor in from yale. she and 26 others wrote a back about how the president of the united states they never met the president of the united states. how he was mentally unhinged. they pulled the same thing on barry goldwater in 1964. sean: you write about that in the book. i give the history. this isn t news. but the people made news. they pushed them out there. new york times runs an anonymous op-ed, it s a fake event. then there is a week worth of news on an anonymous op-ed. sean: mark, this is important. because for two plus years, they have peddled lies and conspiracy theories. again, when you take it to what we reported. hillary rigged a primary.
the house, they will give them a pass. they largely have given them a pass. i want to repeat the new york times did not cover the holocaust in any significant way. the new york times has a history of this. i explain this in the book. let me repeat this. when hamas fires missiles in to israel, somehow the new york times always winds up on the side of hamas. the new york times did this unbelievable story one christmas i think it was last christmas about how hezbollah in lebanon was celebrating christmas with the christians. laissez les bon temps rouler ihezbollah is a brutal militiatd killed american soldiers, american marines. the new york times puffs them up. and then they start attacking the president for turning this in to a political issue. it is not a political issue. the media have got to come to grips. they are destroying themselves. people are going elsewhere. there is new technology. there is going to be more
anything that is evil out there somehow they try to tie the president into it. but this is particularly pernicious. the democrat party has a growing tolerance for antisemitic bigotry. nancy pelosi would not propose a resolution that particularly named omar as the anti-semite that she repeatedly proves that she is. sean: did you see the imam she allowed in congress? the history is out there for anyone to see. talib, same thing. keith ellison, same thing. the closeness with farrakhan and sharpton in my opinion, same thing. the democrat party has a high tolerance for it. so the media has a high tolerance for them. you found out and pointed out how they were covering up. if he had said it was david duke they would haven t tolerance for it. we don t. but because these are democrats, because they are the first two women muslim in