any of this. they say they re just bringing in a supermarket to the area. it s a good thing. in this case, it was just handled poorly across the board. there were obvious ethical conflicts that the city knew about throughout this process. thank you, ryan, for bringing this to our attention.a no problem, thank you.: politically connectedthntio developers win, but what about the people who own property where the settlement with the development is supposed to go. one man own has studio that the government plans to tear down there and they offered you money for it. they offered you $600,000.i oh, yeah. unfortunately, the building was up for sale for 2.2 million. so the sweatw equity into the property. i built ten rooms there. three spaces that are fully livable. i had a visiting artist studio. this is serious your stuff is in museums. i have five pieces in the philadelphia art museum and in e 20, 25 museums around the country and world.
senators. we need to leave this permanent bureaucracy and the lobbyistsaur behind. but they would follow the capitol to nebraska.nd. what we need to obviously recognize thatat incremental tweaking isn t going to fix thec crisis we have.won you re right. a river of money flows to washington right now. we need to be talking fundamentally about what are th limited number of constitutional duties that the federal government has. this is adti mess. now, your commercial is called the outside area. come on, you were chief of stafe at the u.s. department of justice. chief of staff to a representative. you had a consulting contract with the department of homeland security. you were an assistant secretarye for planning at hhs. you have only been out of washington a few years. a you re just another insider.i yeah. it s a fair question, but it s not reality. you re right. i have worked in washington for about four private sector guy and my wife
the end of the film in the credits you see special thanks to to paris and other public movie subsidies. where does the big pot of money, the flies will come to the honey pot. there is a whole industry now in europe that helps people get the government money. in brussels especially where the e.u. subsidy pays 15 billioa euros a year. there are lots of private for-profit companies that now exist solely to advise businesses and individuals on how they can get subsidy.how some of the subsidy, hungarian firm got $560,000 torb develop hydrotherapy for dogs.e that s correct. hydrotherapy for dogs. the wwf, world wifelife fund also got 16,000 euros for effectively a nature appreciation program for italian farmers. other farmers got them to reconsider their relationship with the landscape and become
things in life.re voluntarily, that s the best n or by force. washington is more dangerous because it can source people to give money and privileges to their cronies. they force us to subsidize farmers, grain energy, racer tracks, congressional staff. you don t think you re forced? try not paying your taxes. if you don t pay, they ll put you in jail. i don tll really care if willn smith puts his son, jaden, in his movies or drew barrymoore was in . t. cause her dad was a famous actor. i don t care because we weren t forced to pay for those movies. people volunteer toop give money to them. i do.o but government is forced. that s why it s evil andt government gets bigger and bigger and gives even more special privileges to the people behind that velvet rope.pl contributors and their cronies, another reason to shrink the 3th
companies that taxpayers paid for that have gone bankrupt. bound solar, a 123 systems, subsidiary, enter 1 range,ncl fuels, beacon and so one after the other that went broke. you look at all these, too. they have ties all back to a democratic administration. not all most of them do. in the most open, honest administration in history. it sounds terrible whend you read this list of thesele w companies that stumbled. in fact, i think if you look atm it in a broader context, failure rate of companies like this far less than in the private marketplace. not every investment succeeds, whether it be a government investment or private investment. but that doesn t mean we stop investing in our future. why should we have the government insuring that some of them succeed? s putting their thumb on the scale and say these little guys over here are somehow better than the