To say. Is there any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Mr. Woois, we have rebuttal time. Three minutes. 3 minutes. Things have changed. The first thing i would like to mention is i have been as Everybody Knows more or less the driving force. Im not shamed of that. In fact it is important to note that no place at any time have i made an issue of the view. My issue has entirely been from the very first both at the hearing on august 28th in my statement of opposition that i submitted to mr. Sanchez before the hearing and in our brief if you read it you will see i make no reference to the view at all. My concern as you can tell from my initial presentation is about the place. The place you are while you are seeing the view. Another claim you raised a very good question in asking the applicant what in fact this provides to you . As far as i can see it doesnt really provide very much. Not to mention that its totally unnecessary. The one thing that i wanted to
Future . You can change what is then missing by changing the software, by changing what is projected and missing. So, missing isnt a static installation. It is an installation that is going to grow and change over time. And she has worked to bring all of this information together from laboratory after laboratory including, fortunately, our great fwroup of researche e g researchers at the california academy. This couldnt have been more Site Specific to this place and we think just visually in terms of its scupltural form it really holds its own against the architectural largest and grandeur of the building. It is an unusual compelling object. We think it will draw people out on the terrace, they will see the big cone and say what is that. Then as they approach the cone tell hear these very unusual sounds that were obtained from the cornell orinthology lab. We have the largest recording of birds, mammals, frogs and insects and a huge library of videos. So this is an absolutely perfect op
Are there any other issues or things you would like to share briefly with respect to your new position as supervisor, or thoughts you have about San Francisco before we wrap up our conversation . I touched on it earlier. For me, personally, especially coming from my background outside of city government, i knew my role on all the Economic Activity in San Francisco, focusing on jobs, but also, a lot of quality of life issues. Young families, what is like to live here as a San Francisco, and what we can do in city hall to make life better for San Francisco residents. To me, that is a huge deal. I think we have lost focus on that in city hall over the past few years. It is something i want to focus on. To me, it is a huge priority, why i did this. I will be very true what i talk about on the campaign trail. Representing a. 2, but also the city representing a district 2, but also the city and county of San Francisco. It is such an honor and unique experience, and of just having a great tim
Weve been figuring out we can save money and heartache if we raise the age in which a person can get a license to 25. Now, that got their attention. Usually theyd start booing and yelling. And also decided to raise the age in which a person can date because sexually transmitted diseases are a serious problem among younger people. So were going to pass a law you cant date without a parent on a date until youre 30. Then, im excited. Were going to make it where you cant buy alcohol until youre at least 28 years old. Because under aged drinking is a real problem. And by that time, virtually everybody in high school was yelling and screaming. Then, id say wait a minute. You guys told me you didnt care about politics and government. The fact is that if you dont care, if you dont vote, we can do anything to you that we want to. I said politicians dont work for the people. Are you kidding yourself . If you that i youre naive. Politicians work not for the people, but voters. The voters are the
And look at Robert Mueller over his russia ties when he was running the fbi. Meanwhile, the democrats and the allies are saying all of that is a distraction from their favorite topic which is trump, rush occlusion. Well do our best to get to the bottom of it. Lets focus on the one aspect that is most important to our National Security. Its not getting enough attention. All the talk about the uranium one do we keep your about a committee that approved the sale. I talked about it a few weeks ago and explained why we have to stand up to china. All Chinese Companies should be thrown out of america. And we should use a committee to block any further investment by Chinese Companies when the chinese regime in our economy. Steve this committee, sippy us, my just as well become the committee that is selling out america. Not only did they approve the uranium deal, they turned a blind eye to National Security. Years ago they approved the sale of our ports. More recently they presided over deals t