this together. check out my new show, that is all-time we have tonight. mike emanuel and the fox news at night team, take it from here. this is a fox news alert. the most significant escalation by iran in months, the rogue nation s revolutionary guard season a british oil tanker surrounding it with boats and helicopters and bringing it to an iranian port. the british government warns of serious consequences after holding emergency meetings in london. the question facing the president in a time his america first impulse, the british, asking for help, what will we do? welcome to fox news at night. our coverage kicks off with jill turner putting her national
belongings? the law allows people to be present with their items to hold it. i believe that one met with surprise. if you are present it is not taken a different band and on public property, that is when it becomes an issue. there is a strong argument this is taken to the supreme court it would be a question whether there is property interest in property they abandoned on public sidewalks and not only that but if something is taken the individual is left a notice and they can go downtown to storage network is a hold onto the item for 90 days so they can go retrieve it. if the city attorney does not fight this case aggressively, los angeles will become a city of filth and disease. in a warm weather environment,
traditional iran hawks and the american first non-interventionalists. speaking for the hawks look no further than national security adviser john bolton in the oval office today. behind the desk in the oval office. no question this was an iranian drone. the uss boxer it posed a threat. entirely the right thing to do. reporter: the taking of the british ship ups the ante with an ally but is a direct threat to us sovereignty? it was called unacceptable, the response would be considered and robust. the iranian actions, weeks and the brits grabbed one of the iran s tankers. the iranian s promised that would not go unanswered and here we are. we have a close alliance with
i saw his speech more as a defense of the west speech than america first speech as someone who has been critical of the america first impulse of the presidency. i don t think he has a real cohesive overarching world view which is why i think you run into problems with realism and pragmatism versus your ideology in protecting the values of the west. and marco rubio just tweeted about his meeting with putin and the cyber crimes unit about how trump doesn t really walk this line. while reality and pragmatism partnering with putin is akin to partnering with assad on a chemical weapons unit. this is a preview of where hawks in the senate might be on this. it s a problem with trump s because he doesn t have that world view he can do a speech and go behind closed doors and do something entirely different and contradictory. marco roobio being very