To provide testimony on all items listed below, including consideration of whether to certificate the eir. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission will consider action on certificating the final Impact Report and the recreation and Park Commission will act jointly to consider raising the shadow limit for the park, and the Recreation Commission will consider making a recommendation to the Planning Commission, regarding the possible, adverse effect on the park, and following action on those items. The recreation and Park Commission will adjourn. And the Planning Commission will remain in session, and separately consider, action on all other entitlements. Item one, case number 2011. 0409 eat 925, Mission Street and various parcels known as the 5 m project. Certification of the environmental Impact Report, please note that the public hearing is closed. The Public Comment period for the draft ier ended on january, 7, 2015, the Public Comment will be received when the item is c
Here. Hillis. Here. Johnson. Here. Moore. Here. Richards. Here. And for the recreation and Park Commission. Buell. Here. Low. Here. Lef. And mcdonnell have an excused absence. Thank you, commissioners. Under your special calendar, please note that the joint commissions will hold one public hearing for the public to provide testimony on all items listed below, including consideration of whether to certificate the eir. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission will consider action on certificating the final Impact Report and the recreation and Park Commission will act jointly to consider raising the shadow limit for the park, and the Recreation Commission will consider making a recommendation to the Planning Commission, regarding the possible, adverse effect on the park, and following action on those items. The recreation and Park Commission will adjourn. And the Planning Commission will remain in session, and separately consider, action on all other entitlements. Item one, c
Committee, then there is opportunity in the full board but if there is Public Comment in the committee there is not any at the full board. Thank you. Commissioner hur . So am i right that there were two documents and a 14page document and a summary document and that is correct, commissioner hur and there were two documents and were ier of those documents distributed to any of the members of the committee. Prior to the meeting . I do not believe so and not to my recollection. The first time that the Committee Member saw it was the same meeting that the public saw it . It was quite for them to get ready and if i remember they were ready just before the meeting. Thank you. Thank you. Mr. True, so, is that the only reason why they were to be distributed during the meeting it was just taking so long to get them . There was obviously a very significant project that was a subject of a great deal of negotiation. And our hope was that we were going to get, you know, complete agreement that we w
Hearing tonight absent pastor gavin. This matter has been pending for quite some time. I am disappointed that pastor gavin is not able to attend our hearing based on her complaint. Commissioners, any discussion . Commissioner hur, you said that we should continue and give her a chance to present her case before us. Well, i am not sure that i was on the side of continuing it then. But the commission did continue the matter, and i think gave sufficient notice to pastor gavin and so i am comfortable Going Forward today. And i notice in the letter that we received from pastor gavin, there is no request for a specific time, it is essentially to say, to continue it until further notice. And a medical release from her physician. And as i think that i commented at the time when we did agree to continue it is that the defendants have some rights here as well as the complainant. And i think that to keep this matter open indefinitely, just is unfair to them. Sosposed to not to determine the matte
Summary prepared in advance of this hearing and the findings of this commission are so predictable that it makes me feel clarvoyant and the only thing that i am clear on is whether it is covering the back sides or kissing them and again, what difference does it make, the end rault is the Ethics Commission finding in favor of the city and against the values and interest of the citizens of San Francisco. In this case the board of supervisors managed to discriminate against and violate the rights of so many protected classes that it is impossible to enumerate them, the elderly, single parents, people of color, veterans and disabled and the list goes on and i have told this to the board of supervisors directly, and this commission today s from what i can tell, going to put its perimeter on those actions. They wanted to pass this and they didnt want the bad subpolicety of having all of these disenfranchised people showing up and making Public Comment and you cant tell me when you hand out a