Wait for the temperature, its 51 degrees. Not bad, well take it. We dont usually have our bare pigs in the sand on the final page of the calendar, dont usually have shorts on our legs or top down on the jeep either, but, yes, this is december in r rehobeth and getting warmer. We just moved from georgia. I love it, but i dont love it. Its christmastime, so i feel like im in florida or something, but i love we all love the beach weather. Reporter this santa at the Christmas Store is way overdressed. The surfing santa has it right. It is nice, the sounds of the waves, crashing and the chathing at beach businesses who appreciate the warm weather when they want people to come down here for holiday shopping. They say their only bad postsummer weekend was in october when the noreaster came through. Since then, things have been great. Of course, if you sell scarves, youre marking them down. Shovels and rock salt are stuck on the shelves at the ace hardware. Also a heck of a deal on the snow th
Meeting for the Police Department and required for all captains and i cant even send anybody because we are in lock down for that meeting. This is the meeting where every time we have this summit i have not missed. Im a huge entertainment person. I love going out in San Francisco. I hope that jocelyn and are my personal friends. I want to assure everyone that the Police Department is here for you. Tourism drives this city, entertainment drives this city. We just had beta brekers, i hope everybody thinks it was a success. This was all this weekend and now it goes as the weather gets better and we have daylight savings time and i enjoy the Panel Discussion on video surveillance. I have to again reassure you, the camera is for you, for your safety, outside the portal to your place. We have made cases, solved violent crime, absolved people of accusations. Its been a smart thing to do. It is not our video. It is your video. We could not come and take your video. If you want to give it to us
Have some very strong opinions on surveillance cameras. Would you like to share . I would love to share. In 2010 there was an attempt to make it a law to have night clubs have Security Cameras and our mayor made a very clear statement that that was not something that our city wanted. Also, if the Police Department wants footage, there are legal ways to go about getting footage if it exist. Putting a condition on a permit to side step those laws, those processes, its not good for our community. If the Police Department wants to have cameras outside of my business, let them engage the community and let them do it themselves. Im not interested in participating in surveillance on my patrons. So, do you think that [ applause ] do you think that more businesses should bear the cost or not bear the cost of cameras instead of the city bearing the cost. I think the city should have cameras. There are places where that is useful. Having cameras near registers can save many dollars. If you believ
That is useful. Having cameras near registers can save many dollars. If you believe your clientele is potentially violent on damaging in terms of graffiti cost, you can have many reasons to have cameras. If a business wants to install their cameras and use them, they should bear that cost. If footage exist that Law Enforcement wants access to, there is a process that allows the Law Enforcement access to that. So, if a business wants to install cameras, absolutely they should bear the cost, but having Law Enforcement require cameras, that cost should not be passed onto the business. I have very mixed feelings about cameras but i tend to lean to what berry is talking about. We seem to be karening willie and nilly to this camera side. We are crossing the line now between reasonable, Video Surveillance in public being a reasonable part of the policing or Police Action and you get into the unreasonable police infringement of the 4th amendment. Let me read you one of these conditions so you
Dollars. If you believe your clientele is potentially violent on damaging in terms of graffiti cost, you can have many reasons to have cameras. If a business wants to install their cameras and use them, they should bear that cost. If footage exist that Law Enforcement wants access to, there is a process that allows the Law Enforcement access to that. So, if a business wants to install cameras, absolutely they should bear the cost, but having Law Enforcement require cameras, that cost should not be passed onto the business. I have very mixed feelings about cameras but i tend to lean to what berry is talking about. We seem to be karening willie and nilly to this camera side. We are crossing the line now between reasonable, Video Surveillance in public being a reasonable part of the policing or Police Action and you get into the unreasonable police infringement of the 4th amendment. Let me read you one of these conditions so you can see what im talking about. I have probably seen 20 of th