second amendment to bear arms. but it s that for some reason we keep forgetting the second part of that constitutional protection, which means we need you need gun control, well-regulated militia. i don t think that the situation we have in place right now is a well-regulated militia. there needs to be every single constitutional right has its limitations and in this case for some reason while we have even limitations on the first amendme amendment, we have a party in this country, the republican party, who refuses to acknowledge that there are meant to be limitations in the second amendment, well-regulated militia. let s repeat it again. well-regulated militia. if you re going to keep repeating that, you have to know what it means and the history of the context. i do know what it means? i don t think you do. a well-regulated militia at that
amendme amendment? we re concerned about the escalation with no end game, no strate strategy. we also can t get a straight answer as to whether they think they have existing authority to engage in a pre-emptive war against iran. there are many of us that worry they could launch a strike and never come to congress. we thought this was a no brainer today. our resolution said if the president is engaging in a strike that is pre-emptive, it s no in defense of our troops or in retaliation to an attack against our troops, he should have to come to kocongress. we only got one republican. i thought this was something we could get consensus on. the message it sends to the administration is as unserious as they are about consulting with congress, it doesn t appear that at least republicans are willing to stand up for our constitutional responsibilities as well.
of the judiciary committee, said he is concerned about what mccabe said about the 25th am d amendme amendment. he wants to hear from mccabe under oath about that. jim jordan of the house oversight committee wants to hear from somebody cake under on oath. they have concerned about mccabe s credibility. they want him under only. democrats probably going to want to hear what he has to say as well. he is on a book tour. if he can continue to draw people s attention, i think that s what he is going to do. we saw the same thing when james comey was out there with his book that he was pedaling. now i think we re waiting for the real report. we re waiting for the mueller investigation to conclude or waiting to see what parts will be made public.
that. he wants implementing language. there needs to be implementing language. i don t see any way around that. regardless of you want it to be implemented tomorrow or whether you are trying to frustrate it. there is a law we have to pass in order to comply with this amendme amendment. this was passed by 65% of florida. and this incoming republican governor says, i don t care. we re going to implement it the way we say. yeah. i mean, and i have to tell you, joy, when you look at that, when you look at what s happening in wisconsin and in michigan and what has happened in north carolina, i have to sort of disrespect the respectfully say that i disagree with charlie. i believe that this is the death of democracy. what we are witnessing, in my opinion, is the republican party rejecting every single basis,
demand our respect, they reveal the broad public support for legislation and minimize the risk of mass killings of students and others in our societies but the demonstrators should seek more effective and mo more. concern that a national standing army might pose a threat to the security of the separate states led to the adoption of that amendme amendment. today he writes that concern is a relic of the 18th century. stevens goes on to take on the nra and their unmatched influence over anything and everything related to guns. he says his remedy, which he wrote about extensively in his last book in 2014, would make our school children safer and honor the memories of the dead. and on that note, that is our broadcast on this tuesday night.