Third Circuit rules relation-back doctrine allows for amendment of pleadings after statute of repose period expires pennrecord.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from pennrecord.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
PHILADELPHIA – The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has unanimously affirmed that board members of the Tunkhannock Area School District Board did not violate the constitutional rights of one of its former elementary school principals, when the District fired him in 2016 for two incidents of driving under the influence.
Third Circuit reinstates former corrections officer s retaliation claim; He says he was fired for reporting racism pennrecord.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from pennrecord.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Ambro | Ballotpedia
PHILADELPHIA – A per curiam panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has agreed with a lower court that corrections officers and administrators did not deny a state prisoner access to doctor-ordered treatment.
On May 27, Third Circuit judges Thomas L. Ambro, Patty Shwartz and David J. Porter
affirmed the dismissal in favor of Timothy Miller, CCPM/PCM; Heather Haldeman, Major of the Guard for Unit Management; Richard Ellers, Correctional Health Care Administrator and Mark Garman, Facility Manager/Superintendent, and against plaintiff Thomas Flick.
“Flick is a Pennsylvania state prisoner who was housed at State Correctional Institute Rockview. In October 2019, Flick filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, alleging Eighth Amendment violations against defendants. Flick has gender dysphoria, and alleged in his complaint that defendants denied him access to doctor-ordered treatment to address excessive body
PHILADELPHIA – A panel of judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has affirmed the ruling of a lower federal court, which stated that a pair of professional malpractice cases were properly dismissed due to their not containing certificates of merit.