their normal means to get people that they think are unpopular or they don t like or have a political animus towards. i mean, one of the prosecutors from that office left that office and decide to write a book in violation of grand jury secrecy laws. and hundreds of ethics and all those other things. but what he said in that book was there were so many pearls of that book for the president. trump, but one of them was that they despised him so much. he despises he would have paid to prosecute donald trump. think about that. we were both prosecutors. i mean, just think about that statement and those implications. and then here s the kicker. they hated the man so much that they were looking for a crime to fit. it s not supposed to be that way in this country. it s not supposed to be where you look for a crime to fit a target that you don t like. you re supposed to get information that gets brought to your attention of a crime and you hold responsible those parties that you deem commit
contributions. that was the furthest thing from trump s mind. obviously, the reason he didn t want that to be made public is it would be embarrassing to his family, to his friends. but, you know, i m reminded when i was a young civil rights worker and i trained to go down south in the 1960s, our trainers taught us one thing. don t spit on the floor. don t put out your cigarettes because they re targeting you. they re looking for you as civil rights workers. they will indict you for a felony if you put out a cigarette on the floor. and we all learn that lesson because we knew we were being targeted and now bragg is following the absolute lead of the segregationist south prosecutors and police by targeting somebody who is unpopular, just like the civil rights. it s a terrible, terrible precedent to follow. and it will establish a terrible precedent that could again be used as it was against the law. exactly. all right, greg jarrin, what were they re talking about is an unreported, al
to the nation. so any means justifies a malevolent end and this is the guy who conjured up out of thin air a crime that doesn t really exist. and then so. well, it s an affront to our system of justice, truly. but, you know, professor dershowitz, one of the problems here is that this is this is a case brought by rabid trump haters. this is not about justice. it s not about a crime. we already know that there is no basis in it for the law. and yet you ve got this guy, mark pomerance, wrote a book that was unethical. it was about a case and he was in the middle of the investigation up. and you ve got alvin trump hater, letitia james , the attorney general in new york , a trump later. this is what they do in third world countries. well, it s worse than that. you know, she ran for office, letitia james on the campaign pledge to get trump.
report, fox news contributor sara carter. good evening, sarah . , reporgood evening, judge j. i spent the afternoon here inouo new york city talking to folks about how they felt about manhattan districtct att attorney alvin bragg.or and , you know, many o alvif themknow, many o echoed the exact same sentiments as governor ron desantis of florida. d sametake a listen. lis te here in new york city, obv you ve obviously heard about president trump s possible upcoming indictmen t. right.ht what s going through your mind when you hear about that? it s upsetting because going t s very own livelihood was actually so much better under trump s presidency. i know a lot of problems came when biden came. i m not too political , butshouf i know that s the thing. i think that he should probably l crimes.hat he should probably we focus more on local crime. we live up on the upper easte side, soon the i think crime ar the streets is probably more of a problem than prosecutingn th trump right now.