office of housing to there was an early morning saturday fire at the hunters view affordable housing development site. luckily, there were no injuries, but the site was damaged, including the progress we had made for the affordable housing sites. we are still evaluating what that means. sf fire department is investigating. i think you ll have to work with the developer as you would with any developer project to see what they would be able to do or what additional fine and they would need similar to any affordable housing project that deceived financing that had damaged at the construction site. there is not a reserve set aside in our budget but we have had experiences like this in the past. we will be responsive to what the development team needs out there. supervisor cohen: thank you. i did not need to cut you off with my question, but the cfo answer it. that is why they are here to . team effort. that is why they are here. team effort. supervisor cohen: could you conti
what they would be able to do or what additional fine and they would need similar to any affordable housing project that deceived financing that had damaged at the construction site. there is not a reserve set aside in our budget but we have had experiences like this in the past. we will be responsive to what the development team needs out there. supervisor cohen: thank you. i did not need to cut you off with my question, but the cfo answer it. that is why they are here to . team effort. that is why they are here. team effort. supervisor cohen: could you continue to talk about the hope assessed program in relation to the proposed housing trust fund? and it s dedicated sources? the completion of hope sf and the housing trust fund? i can talk briefly about that. currently, the budget includes pope asset is not a fully funded project. we do not have sources for all those sites. i think the housing trust fund would certainly be a potential source for the completion of al
our agreement with the developer, part of that project is that that growth is passed through to the developer to fund additional work in the development area. >supervisor chu: page 10 shows not enforceable activities. these are all items that were previously going through the redevelopment agency, or they were supporting different work being done in some of these other areas that we can no longer pay for through the state legislation. so the general fund is planning to pick up an additional $10 million for the is not enforceable activities, plus the additional million dollars roughly 40 in forcible obligations in year one, your two, an additional $7 million in general fund expense plus the $10 million in forcible obligations? that is right. supervisor chu: over all, the redevelopment agency dissolution has not been neutral to the general fund, it has cost us more. that is correct. supervisor chu: supervisor cohen? supervisor cohen: i am pleased to see jri reflected in the