Forth. So holistically we need to devise a blueprint so that those who have been impacted that justice is done. Thank you very much. Any other Public Comments . I thought we had some any other public . No other Public Comments. All right. We will take note of the communications, is that correct . Item 5 . Correct. Commissioner moran. Mr. President , a couple of items under communication, f and g are basically the water supply report. I have reviewed those and had some conversations with staff. I think there is a couple of areas where the reports are incomplete. And other areas because of that incompleteness they are misleading. I would like to ask those reports be revised and reissued in january to correct those issues. Items f and g, thats the order without objection. And the other thing as we talk about Regional Water supply, i mentioned before that, we have our own plans of how we develop that supply, and boska has their own. Another thing i would like to see in january is a discuss
Enrolling in the program as a result. A question about the physician spending projections. You mention that your projections included the 21 i think reduction thats coming april 1st. Actually, no. Im sorry. Ill let you finish. I just wanted to clarify. Sure. The 21 reduction is in current law and thats under the Sustainable Growth rate formula. But what our projections our projections are consistent with the projected baseline scenario in the Medicare Trustees report. And in that, payment rates are expected to grow at 0 for 2015, then. 6 through the remainder of the projection period, per year, on average. These projections do not include the cut under the Sustainable Growth rate formula. In terms of the couple times it came up, the increase in highcost specially drugs and a specific mention of the hepatitis treatments that are out there. Does this analysis include any offsetting factors for someone getting cured of hepatitis and therefore not having ongoing costs in the future as a re
Angry about this money and the millions that the coke brothers are spending through many different venues. If youre just tuning in or listening on cspan radio, our focus, the mid term elections less than 60 days before voters go to the polls and early voting in many parts of the country. Ac from missouri. Good morning. Go ahead. Caller ive always considered myself a democrat. Ok. Im 56 years old. And a taxpayer. From a single mans point of view, missouri ive been clearly, cleared for medicaid. But missouri being having opted having medicaid come through. Since im legally by medicaid i am not eligible for obamacare. As a u. S. Tax citizens, as single, a 56yearold man, where should i swing my vote to get the most impact . I said this time i want to know should it go to a woman, should it go to im right now, im always considered myself democrat. Ok, im at this point in my life where maybe i need to switch my way of thinking. Host thanks very u much for the call. Nathan let me turn to you
As induce very that supports them because they will ultimately have dubai, man, train and equip not only the current force we have, but the course of the future. They have to be ready to address the growing challenges will likely face across the entire indo Asian Pacific in the world. The comments i made were not about american rebounds to the act because that is track. Were making progress and opaque on commanders is. We are doing the things we have committed and said we would do to the rebalance. My comments were about the current sophistication and capabilities of todays Weapons Systems and relative dominance with the systems. The warfare capabilities we must also ensure we invest in the proper mix of the offensive capabilities that manan equipped ships. And capabilities they have a bleep on domino required and they must continue to strive for that. I will stop and take your questions. The last point you make, do not think the u. S. Is losing ground and dominance in the pacific and
Director of building inspection. Ted yam could not be present today because of a medical emergency. What he was asked to do was talk to references and find out what positions that were similar in scope and level to what were asking for for the director of building inspection and to talk to the references that are provided by the vendors to get their experience, how they what kind of positions that were on the recruitment, whether they were satisfied with the vendor, whether they were satisfy i had with the level of service, whether they were satisfied with the amount of money, it was a full type of vetting. He did it very professionally with a full list of questions and as should be done, he asked the same questions to each of the vendors. As a result he discovered Ralph Anderson and associates had not conducted a similar search of chief Building Official for director of Building Department and therefore has moved on and feels that it should be then short listed to two because that was