Investigation which occurred months before my appointment or matters related to the so called steel and dossier these matters are the subject of ongoing review by the department any questions on these topics should therefore be directed to the f. B. I. Or the Justice Department the 3rd as i explain this morning it is important for me to adhere to what we wrote in our report the report contains our findings and analysis and the reasons for the decisions we made we stated the results of our investigation with precision i do not intend to summarize or describe the results of our work in a different way in the course of my testimony today and as i stated in may i also will not comment on the actions of the attorney general or of congress i was appointed as a prosecutor and i intend to adhere to that role and to the Department Standards that govern finally as i said this morning. Over the course of my career i have seen a number of challenges to our democracy the russian governments efforts
Justice. That is correct and what about total exoneration did you actually totally exonerate the prez you know now in fact your reports expressly states that it does not exonerate the person it does republicans fiercely defended the president when he said donald trump is not above the law hes not but he didnt im sure shouldnt be below the law which is where volume 2 of this work puts him and he knows hes innocent hes not corrupt really acting in order to see that justice is done what do you doing is not obstructing justice he is pursuing justice the former special counsel did seem to indicate the president could still face trouble from his report could you charge the president with a triumph after he left office yes you believe that he committed you could charge the president on stage with obstruction of justice after he left office yes. And muller had a message for the American People the russian interference is real and it continues and when the single attempt theyre doing as we sit
Indicate the president could still face trouble from his report could you charge the president with a triumph after he left office yes you believe that he committed you could charge the president on stage with obstruction of justice after he left office yes in an evening News Conference House Democrats continue to reject the view of the president and his republican supporters and were insistent that millers questioning was a crucial part of a congregational investigative process that could end in impeachment why id like it to be a strong case is because i dont its based on the facts the facts in the law thats what matters not politics not partisanship just patriotism after a day that highlighted the Political Division in congress one thing is clear the investigation into President Trump will not end with Robert Miller mike hanna aljazeera washington. Lets also come here and i was there including step down as many trees as its arrested the recently appointed chief of staff and defeated
Elevated importance for the Chinese Party state you know the thing is that there is at language with reference to maintaining Political Security maintaining social stability so very much code a language for maintaining the control of the party ok one of the other big messages from this was the fact that the u. S. Is undermining global stability id like to examine that. Saying with you in what way is the u. S. On so many global stability according to this white paper in this report. Yes so in beijings view the u. S. Is pursuing what it what it called hedge monism so essentially security a security at the cost of others and being able to exercise a degree of power that is seized as illegitimate. But also in the region in beijings view that the United States is increasingly antagonistic towards beijing whether that be in the South China Sea a with reference to taiwan and indeed rain foresman of the us Alliance Networks and deployments and other forms of intervention in the region and beyo
Recently the former director of the cbo has estimated that designating Asset Managers could cost investors as much as 25 of their return on their investments over the long term. Approximately 100,000 per investor. In other words, as it operates in the shadows, fsoc can take away the seed capitol necessary to launch a Small Business or to send a child to college. That is both unfair and unwise. And while fsoc seems dead set on trying to find Systemic Risk where no one else seems to find it, a review of their latest report indicates that it is willingly and willfully blind to the largest sources. At the mention of fannie mae and freddie mac at the epicenter of the last financial crisis and without the of the administration to and permanent taxpayer subsidies, they are certain to be at the center of the next financial crisis. No mention of the federal government itself, 17 trillion in debt and growing, more debt incurred under the sub ministration than in our nations first 200 years. Our