couple reasons. one is ultimately i think we ve got is this idea is that the executive branch does have purview over the federal immigration systems. you could have essentially 50 different presidents at one given time. that is untenable. i do think the other thing is what you talked about, which is the idea that the pandemic is with us. we live by it, it affects us. as a matter of public policy, it s winding down. the president himself has said the pandemic is over. the states that are suing to keep title 42 intact basically have forgotten the pandemic existed long ago. so, i don t think there s a tenable way to argue that this public health order has to be put into effect or kept in effect at the same time you think the public health emergency no longer applies to any other facet of society. allen, you were invoked, is a
better answer. i d love your thoughts on the same question. i agree with him 100%. it s time to do the right thing. this is america. we ve been to the moon. we ve been to mars. we can manage our border. it s a 20,000 people a day arriving at the border, we really need to reconsider what we re doing here. i think once again it s just a choice of who we want to process. and in this world, the people are those from the northern triangle. so, it actually works as inclusion act for those individuals and allows other individuals, ukrainians, to come in. so, there are equities that keep brown and black immigrants and allow other immigrants to come into this country which is not who we are and who we say we are. stan sign, allen orr, thanks so much. when we come back, there are new battles on the voting rights front to tell you about, including a so-called legal red wave of lawsuits intended to disrupt our elections.
it s not really a pandemic thing. it s something that stephen miller enacted along with his other policies, such as remain in mexico. what we got yesterday from the supreme court was a procedural salad, where they said the federal government could continue to do anything with regards to policy. but right now they want to see if these states could intervene this late in a case to see if they can well, the ruling that we re going to get maybe in june will be with regards to whether these states have standing in the case, not with regards to whether title 42 or any discussion about title 42. it will just be standing with regard to these states intervening as a later action. it s a side step. we ve seen this consistently with supreme court cases in immigration. this is the last in the realm of things, where they sort of punt again, as they did with daca and other cases in the past. allen, what do we make of, how bad is it, it s so bad neil gorsuch voted with the liberal justices. what
Democrats are seeking to reduce the number of illegal immigrants in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention as part of an omnibus spending bill.
An immigration attorney on MSNBC claimed the United States is breaking its own laws for not offering asylum to illegal immigrants while discussing the pending end of a Trump-era immigration policy.